4/6/1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY ARE COMING BACK WITH A STUDY OF THIS AREA AND POSSIBLY WILL RECOMMEND REZONING THE ENTIRE AREA TO R-1, HE CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE ALREADY QUITE A FEW HOMES IN THIS AREA, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWS IT AS LOW DENSITY, MR. CAMERON OF WABASSO APPEARED REPRESENTING MR. STAILErY AND STATED THAT MR. STAILEY WISHES TO BU11D A RESIDENCE ON THIS PROPERTY, THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED THAT THIS MATTER WILL BE CONSIDERED FURTHER AT`THE MEETING OF MAY 18TH. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WILL STUDY THE NEW REQUIREMENTS FQR REZONING PROCEDURE AND REPORT BACK. HE THAN INFORMED THE. BOARD THAT HE HAD TWO EMERGENCY ITEMS WHICH WE FELT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, TNF RnADn IINANTM IM1 V APPRnvpn Amms TWO i:MFRT_FNCV TTFMC TO ':'rnov'c AGENDA AS REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY COLLINS. ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT HE HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THE ZONING DEPARTMENT TO FILE = SUIT AGAINST BURL BLOSSER WHO HAS A TRAILER ON HIS PROPERTY -IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, HE NOTED THAT MR. BLOSSER WAS PROSECUTED BY THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND FOUND GUILTY, BUT PENALTIES WERE SUSPENDED; THE.TRAILER IS STILL ON THE PROPERTY; AND ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER RECOMMENDS THAT AN INJUNCTION BE FILED WITH THE CIRCUIT COURT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY COLLINS TO PROCEED TO FILE AN INJUNCTION AGAINST BURL BLOSSER AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZONING DIRECTOR. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT HAS HAD A QUESTION RAISED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE LOCAL BANKS IN REGARD TO RESOLUTION N0. 77-6 WHICH SPECIFICALLY GIVES THE CLERK AND/OR THE FINANCE OFFICER THE AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE TIME DEPOSITS AND U. S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, APPARENTLY SOME QUESTION HAS ARISEN IN REGARD TO THEIR t AUTHORITY TO CASH IN THE TIME DEPOSITS OR SECURITIES THAT WERE PURCHASED PRIOR TO THIS RESOLUTION, AND THE ATTORNEY WOULD LIKE AUTHORIZATION TO 46 APR 1977 0 eock 29 pt ,':2205