Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED `WITH THE BOARD HIS CONCERN IN <br />REGARD TO THE ACTION OF DR, HENRY FISCHER AT THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING <br />& ZONING COMMISSION ON MARCH 31ST, HE NOTED THAT IN 1975, WE FOUND IT <br />NECESSARY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION N0, 75-27 OUTLINING A CODE OF CONDUCT <br />WHICH MADE VERY CLEAR TO MEMBERS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION THE STANL:;RDS <br />UNDER WHICH WE WERE OPERATING AND EXPECTED THEM TO OPERATE, HE CON- <br />TINUED THAT THIS RESOLUTION STATES THAT IF AN OFFICIAL HAS AN INTEREST <br />IN A MATTER UNDER DISCUSSION, HE WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE ANYONE <br />IN THIS REGARD, BUT WILL, IN FACT, STEP DOWN AND LEAVE THE ROOM, HE <br />REFERRED THE BOARD TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING & <br />ZONING COMMISSION OF MARCH 31ST AND CONTINUED THAT HE FELT FROM THESE <br />MINUTES AND FROM CONVERSATIONS HE HAS HAD WITH MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING <br />STAFF AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION THAT THERE <br />HAS BEEN A SERIOUS VIOLATION AND BREACH OF OUR CODE OF CONDUCT, COM- <br />MISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT, IN HIS OPINION, IF THIS IS ALLOWED TO <br />CONTINUE IT WILL DESTROY THE PUBLIC S CONFIDENCE IN OUR ADVISORY BOARD, <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE UNDERSTOOD THAT DR, FISCHER A- <br />MEMBEROF THE PLANN?NG & ZONING COMMISSION IS AN OWNER OF THE FROPERTY <br />THAT WAS UNDER DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING, <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION THE BOARD FELT THAT DR, FISCHER OBVIOUSLY <br />.HAD A DEFINITE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND WAS AWARE OF THE ACTION HE <br />SHOULD HAVE TAKEN, BUT DID NOT, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED THE ATTORNEY WHAT OUR ALTERNATIVES ARE <br />IN SUCH A SITUATION, <br />THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT THE BOARD HAS THE RIGHT TO REMOVE A ZONING <br />OFFICIAL ON 3/5 VOTE OF THE BOARD EVEN IF HIS TERM IS NOT COMPLETED, <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE MATTER SHOULD BE <br />PLACED ON THE NEXT AGENDA SO THE BOARD COULD HAVE COMMENTS FROM THE <br />PEOPLE DIRECTLY INVOLVED, <br />THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN <br />AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT WERE APPROVED AND WAR- <br />RANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND N0, 54610 - <br />54751 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE <br />OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS'SO ISSUED FROM THE <br />RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED <br />BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND <br />67 <br />APR 6 1977- <br />J <br />