My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
5/18/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:43:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN REVIEWED THE STATEMENT, ALSO IN PARAGRAPH <br />H,WHICH THE CITY HAD REVISED TO READ: "THE PARTIES AGREE THAT COUNTY <br />SHALL, SUBJECT TO NOTICE. CITY APPROVAL AND CITY SUPERVISION AS TO GOOD <br />ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES, HAVE THE RIGHT TO <br />HOOK-UP ADDITONAL CUSTOMERS TO THE SEWER LINE......" HE FELT A STATEMENT <br />SHOULD BE ADDED THAT "COUNTY WILL DESIGNATE CUSTOMERS UP TO THE CAPACITY <br />OF THE LINE." <br />CITY MANAGER LITTLE REQUESTED THAT IN PARAGRAPH 9 IT STATE <br />THAT "....VERO MALL SHALL PAY THE CITY $15,000.00 AS A NON-REFUNDABLE nE- <br />VELOPMENT FEE..." HE THEN DISCUSSED TAP -ON FEES. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT CONDOMINIUM OWNERS IN A DEVELOP- <br />MENT THAT HAS A SEWER PLANT, HAVE ALREADY PAID FOR THEIR SEWER ONCE <br />AND HE"FELT THAT WHEN THERE IS AN EXISTING SYSTEM THAT IS FUNCTIONING, <br />THE TAP -ON FEE SHOULD BE APPROACHED DIFFERENTLY THAN WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT; <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO HOOK-UP CHARGES FOR TROPIC <br />GROVES AND SOUTH GATE VILLAGE. CITY MANAGER LITTLE FELT THAT THEY <br />MIGHT ONLY BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR THE HOOK-UP ONTO THE MAIN SEWER LINE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED A STATEMENT BE PUT __LN, THE. ADDESNDUM <br />THAT THE CONNECTION CHARGE FOR SOUTH GATE VILLAGE AND TROPIC GROVES WILL <br />BE $500 EACH OR POSSIBLY THAT THE.CITY SHALL CHARGE THE DIRECT COST OF <br />CONNECTING, <br />MR. LITTLE SUGGESTED THAT IT SHOULD STATE "THE TAP -ON FEE IN <br />ALL CASES SHALL BE THE DIRECT COST OF MAKING SAID CONNECTION." <br />CITY MANAGER LITTLE THEN INFORMEDiME_BOARD THAT THERE WAS <br />ANOTHER PROBLEM - THAT BILL COLLECTION IS VERY DIFFICULT WITH A SEWFP-ON)l' <br />SYSTEM. IF YOU DONT CONTROL THE WATER SERVICE AND THE CUSTOMER WON'T <br />PAY HIS SEWER BILL. WHAT DO YOU DO ABOUT IT? THIS WOULD NOT BE A PPnBLF" <br />WITH VERO MALL, BUT WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS ADDED ON, THE CITY WOULD FITHED <br />NEED THE RIGHT TO READ THE WATER METERS OR TO ASK MID -FLORIDA TO SEND <br />THEM THE READINGS, HE ASKED IF THE COUNTY WOULD LIKE TO GUARANTEE PAYfAP' <br />OF THE BILLS FOR CUSTOMERS OTRER THAN VERO MALL, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT SOME SORT OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Cnt)L_') <br />BE ENTERED INTO TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM, <br />25 <br />MAY 18 19 7729 <br />. , 401 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.