Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED REVIEWING A LIST OF THE LOW VALUE <br />ITEMS BEFORE DE -TAGGING THEM, AND FINANCE OFFICER JACKSON STATED THAT THERE <br />ARE 1,100 OF THESE ITEMS. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED INSTEAD OF A LIST OF THE ITEMS TO BE <br />DE -TAGGED, FINANCE OFFICER JACKSON PREPARE A LIST OF THE ITEMS HE WOULD <br />RECOMMEND REMAIN TAGGED AS SHE DISLIKED ADOPTING THE RESOLUTION WITHOUT <br />SOME KIND OF A LIST TO GO WITH IT. SHE ALSO NOTED THAT THERE I'S A PSYCHO- <br />LOGICAL AFFECT IN HAVING EQUIPMENT TAGGED AND THOUGHT POSSIBLY THE EQUIP- <br />MENT THAT IS DE -TAGGED AND NOT PERMANENTLY INVENTORIED SHOULD HAVE A DIF- <br />FERENT TYPE TAG STATING THAT IT IS COUNTY PROPERTY, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED WHAT THE BENEFIT IS OF DE -TAGGING ITEMS <br />THAT ARE ALREADY TAGGED, <br />FINANCE OFFICER JACKSON REPLIED THAT EVERYTHING THAT IS ON <br />INVENTORY MUST BE COUNTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR AND RECORDS KEPT, WHICH IS <br />AN EXPENSIVE PROCEDURE. BY DE -TAGGING, HE FELT THE INVENTORY COULD BE <br />KEPT DOWN TO A MANAGEABLE SIZE. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, CHAIRMAN WODTKE INSTRUCTED THE FINANCE <br />OFFICER TO SUBMIT TO THE BOARD A LIST OF ITEMS TO BE DETAGGED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE LAST "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED" <br />PARAGRAPH IN THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION WHICH REFERS TO THE SUPERVISORY <br />PERSONNEL OF THE BOARD AND THE CLERK WORKING TOGETHER WAS NOT NECESSARY <br />AND AFTER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED AND DECIDED TO DEFER FURTHER CON- <br />SIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AT THIS TIME. <br />THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK <br />READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: <br />.11 <br />I <br />Y 18 1977 �;r 5 <br />