Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />a <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THERE ARE FOUR ALTERNATIVES: <br />(1) WE CAN PURCHASE WHOLESALE AND RUN IT OURSELVES; <br />(Z) WE CAN PURCHASE WHOLESALE AND WORK OUT A MANAGEMENT CONTRACT WITH THE <br />CITY; <br />(3) WE CAN GO AHEAD WITH ONE CUSTOMER AND THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT; OR <br />(4) WE CAN OPEN UP THE LINE AND HAVE PEOPLE PAY TAP -IN CHARGES. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT ALTERNATIVES 3 AND 4 ARE ENVISIONED <br />IN THE DOCUMENTS WE HAVE BEEN CONSIDERING. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD GET IN THE <br />WHOLESALE BUSINESS AND HE WILL AGREE TO GO ALONG WITH THE AGREEMENT, BUT <br />HAD BEEN HOPING TO SOLVE SOME OTHER PROBLEMS ALONG THE LINE. HE NOTED <br />THAT, IN ANY EVENT, WE MUST REVIEW THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT BY JANUARY OF <br />1978, <br />COUNTY ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF SAID THAT HE FEELS THIS IS THE <br />BEST ROUTE TO TAKE, AND THERE IS THE OPTION TO.APPROACH IT LATER ON A <br />WHOLESALE BASIS SO HE DOESN'T SEE THAT THERE IS ANYTHING TO LOSE EXCEPT <br />THE TAP -IN CHARGES FOR VERO MALL. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT EVEN IF WE COULD TAP THEM ON <br />WITHOUT ANY TAP -ON CHARGE, WE WOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER HAVING ONE ANYWAY BE- <br />CAUSE WE HAVE UPCOMING OBLIGATIONS. <br />MR. LITTLE AGREED, POINTING OUT THAT THE IMPACT FEES KEEP CUSTO- <br />MERS OF MANY YEARS FROM HAVING TO PAY THE FREIGHT FOR THE ONES WHO CAUSE <br />THE INCREASE. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, TO APPROVE THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND VERO MALL AS AMENDED AND FORWARDED BY THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH. <br />MEL SEMBLER, DEVELOPER OF VERO MALL, EXPRESSED HIS APPRECIATION <br />TO THOSE PRESENT FOR HOLDING THIS MEETING TODAY IN AN EFFORT TO RESOLVE <br />THE PROBLEMS ANDASKED TO COMMENT ON TWO PROBLEMS. HE REQUESTED THAT THE <br />MAXIMUM COST TO THE COUNTY OF $3,000 FOR THE 6° LINE BE INCREASED TO RE- <br />FLECT THE ACTUAL COST OF THE OVERSIZING AS THE THE COSTS ARE IN NOW AND <br />COME TO $5,843.00. MR. SEMBLER FURTHER SUGGESTED IN ORDER TO SOLVE SOME <br />OF THE PROBLEMS DISCUSSED TODAY AND ALSO BECAUSE OF MECHANICAL PROBLEMS <br />INVOLVED, THAT RUNNING THE SEWER LINE A DIFFERENT ROUTE BE CONSIDERED. <br />7 <br />pY 231977 9, ��5 <br />