Laserfiche WebLink
AND, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD ADOPT TWO SEPARATE <br />EMERGENCY ORDINANCES. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO RECONSIDER EMERGENCY ORDINANCE <br />No. 77-7. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LOY, TO ADOPT EMERGENCY ORDINANCE N0. 77-7 AMENDING SECTION 20-C1 OF <br />i <br />ORDINANCE N0. 71-3 AS AMENDED TO PROVIDE FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. E <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 8TH THE <br />i <br />BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DECLARED THAT AN EMERGENCY EXISTS IN REGARD 70 SITE <br />PLAN APPROVAL IN THE C-1 AND C -1A DISTRICTS AND APPROVED CONSIDERATION <br />OF AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE. THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THE EMERGENCY TODAY <br />i <br />IS THE SAME AS EXISTED AT OUR LAST MEETING, WHICH IS THAT IT WILL BE <br />DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC IF FURTHER PERMITS ARE ISSUED IN THE C-1 <br />AND C -1A -DISTRICTS WITHOUT THE REQUIREMENT OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AND <br />. i <br />THE ACTUAL INTENT OF HAVING TWO SEPARATE ORDINANCES IS SIMPLY TO SPEAK <br />TO EACH DISTRICT ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. <br />COMMISSIONER S.CHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE VOTED <br />AGAINST ADOPTING THE EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AT THE LAST MEETING BECAUSE HE <br />WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF SITE PLAN APPROVALS THE REVIEW <br />COMMITTEE WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH. HE STATED THAT.HE IS STILL CON- <br />CERNED, BUT WILL NOT VOTE IN OPPOSITION TODAY. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />59 <br />JUN 2 2 1977 <br />