Laserfiche WebLink
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT CHIEF ARAND GET TOGETHER WITH <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR TO EVALUATE THE BIDS, AND THEN THIS MATTER CAN BE BROUGHT <br />UP AGAIN LATER IN THE MEETING, <br />ATTORNEY DARRELL FENNELL CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING <br />NORMAN HENSICK, .JR., IN REGARD TO MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION, WHICH PLAT WAS <br />GIVEN FINAL APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY IN JANUARY OF 1976, ATTORNEY FENNELL <br />INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY NEED THE RELEASE OF A MURPHY DEED ROAD RIGHT- <br />OF-WAY RESERVATION WHICH AFFECTS MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION AND EXPLAINED <br />THAT IN THE STATE'S QUIT CLAIM, THEY EXCEPTED THAT PART OF THE LAND IN <br />MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION LYING WITHIN SIXTY FEET OF THE CENTERLINE OF REBEL. <br />ROAD, WHICH WOULD ENCROACH TWENTY-FIVE FEET INTO THE TWO LOTS WHICH FACE <br />ON REBEL ROAD, HE CONTINUED THAT IN ORDER TO GET A FURTHER RELEASE FROM <br />THE STATE, THE DOT REQUESTED THAT THEY OBTAIN A RESOLUTION FROM THE COUNTY <br />AGREEING TO SUCH A RELEASE, MR. FENNELL STATED THAT THE COUNTY WOULD, IN <br />EFFECT, BE AGREEING THAT A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY IS SUFFICIENT FOR THIS PORTION <br />OF REBEL ROAD, HE NOTED THAT REBEL ROAD IS A 30' ROAD NORMALLY, AND <br />MR. HENSICK INCREASED IT TO 50'. MR. FENNELL SUBMITTED A PROPOSED RESOLU- <br />TION TO THE BOARD, AND STATED THAT THE T.I.I.F. HAD ALREADY APPROVED IT <br />AS TO FORM. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS HAD NO OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY FENNELL'S <br />REQUEST, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THE FORM OF <br />THE RESOLUTION, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTION No. 77-75. <br />17 <br />_JUL 1977 <br />BOOK W PAGE -195 <br />