My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/6/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
7/6/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/06/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS NOT ON THE TAX <br />ROLLS SO THE COUNTY CANNOT GET IT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF TAXES - THEY WOULD <br />HAVE TO CONDEMN IT, IF THEY WANTED IT. HE CONTINUED THAT IF THERE ARE <br />INTERESTED CITIZENS, POSSIBLY THEY COULD FIND SOMEONE WITH AN OLD INTEREST <br />IN THE CORPORATION AND DEAL WITH THEM OR HOLD A MEETING AND REINSTATE THE <br />OLD NON-PROFIT CORPORATION. <br />COMMISSIONER LAY INQUIRED IF A CEMETERY THIS OLD COULD BE GRAND- <br />FATHERED IN UNDER THE EXISTING REGULATIONS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT COULD, BUT STATED THE COUNTY SHOULD <br />BECOME MUCH MORE STRINGENT IN THEIR REGULATIONS. HE NOTED THERE ARE <br />GRAVES ALL OVER THE PLACE, EVEN IN THE COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER THAT IF HE <br />WOULD ORGANIZE A GROUP OF INTERESTED CITIZENS, HE WOULD BE GLAD TO MEET <br />WITH THEM, SUPPLY A LIST OF THE NAMES FROM THE RECORDS OF THE DEFUNCT <br />CORPORATION, AND TRY TO HELP THEM SET A COURSE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REPORTED THAT HIS PROPOSAL FOR THE WIDEN- <br />ING OF 16TH STREET WAS TURNED DOWN BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR DOES HAVE SOME MONEY FOR RESURFACING <br />AND ASKED IF THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER HANDLING THIS PROJECT AS A RESURFAC- <br />ING. HE STATED THAT HE WAS SURE THE CITY WOULD COOPERATE WITH THE MOVING <br />OF MANHOLE COVERS, ETC. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER CONTINUED THAT HE REALIZES <br />THIS COMES UNDER A STATE ROAD PROGRAM, BUT.THE COUNTY IS GOING TO TAKE <br />OVER THESE ROADS EVENTUALLY ANYWAY, AND HE FEELS SOMETHING MUST BE DONE <br />TO IMPROVE THIS NARROW, HIGHLY TRAVELED ROAD. HE ASKED HOW THIS WOULD FIT <br />IN WITH THE ADMINISTRATORS LIST OF PRIORITIES. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ANSWERED THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE A PRIORITY <br />LIST PREPARED AT THIS TIME, BUT FELT THAT POSSIBLY THIS COULD BE DONE AS. <br />A MAINTENANCE JOB, HE NOTED THAT IT APPEARS THERE MAY BE MORE MONEY TO <br />GO INTO RESURFACING THAN ANTICIPATED, AND THIS COULD BE INCLUDED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE MAINTENANCE WE DO ON OUR SUBDI- <br />VISIONS IS VERY IMPORTANT, AND WHILE HE DOES NOT MIND INCLUDING THIS <br />PROJECT ON THE PRIORITY LIST, HE FELT THAT THESE OTHER THINGS SHOULD BE <br />TAKEN CARE OF FIRST AND THEN SEE WHAT WE HAVE LEFT AT THE END OF THE YEAR. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD HIS CONCERN <br />IN REGARD TO REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON EVERYTHING IN THE C-1 AND C -1A <br />40 <br />30 :. <br />JUL 6197 s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.