My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/20/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
7/20/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:48:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/20/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 19-Y-7 <br />TAKE CARE OF ONE PARK AND SUGGESTED HAVING A BEACH PATROL WITH ENFORCEMENT <br />POWERS THAT WOULD PATROL THE BEACHES CONSTANTLY IN A JEEP AS THEY HAVE DONE <br />IN THE COCOA AREA. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF ANY THOUGHT HAD BEEN GIVEN TO <br />LIGHTING, AND MR, BRENNAN SAID THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE LIKED THE IDEA OF PATROLLING <br />ALL THE BEACHES BUT FELT IF WE DON IT HAVE MORE OR LESS 24-HOUR SUPER- <br />VISION, WE WILL HAVE TO FENCE AND LOCK UP THE AREA AND HAVE IT LIGHTED AT <br />NIGHT, HE NOTED THE WHOLE PROJECT DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH MONEY IS AVAILABLE <br />AND FURTHER NOTED THAT OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE SPENT A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY <br />IN THESE PLACES AND SOMETIMES THE RESTROOMS DON T LAST A WEEK. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT IF WE CAN DEVELOP AN ACCEPTABLE PLAN, AT <br />LEAST WE CAN START WORKING TOWARDS IT'.. AND COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT IT <br />CAN BE DONE IN STEPS, <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO HAVING A BOARDWALK AND A <br />PAVILION AT WABASSO BEACH. THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING A SURFING BEACH IN <br />THIS AREA WAS BROUGHT UP, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE REQUESTED THE COUNTY PLANNER TO DO AN UPDATING <br />ON THE PLAN AND THEN MEET WITH COMMISSIONER DEESON AND THE WABASSO CITIZE"j <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE REPORTED ON THE TRIP HE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL <br />COORDINATOR THOMAS MADE TO ATLANTA TO DELIVER THE EDA APPLICATION FOR <br />FUNDS FOR THE WATER LINE PROJECT TO GIFFORD, HE STATED THAT THEY TOOK <br />TWO APPLICATIONS WITH THEM - ONE A FULL APPLICATION FOR THE ORIGINAL <br />$670"009, WHICH WAS ACTUALLY A RE^APPLICATION AND CARRIED AN ENDORSEMENT <br />FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD WITH IT, THE OTHER APPLICATION, STRICTLY ON THE <br />COUNTY"S PART�I WAS FOR THE FULL AMOUNT PLUS AN INDICATION THAT WE COULD <br />DERIVE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE $365,000 TENTATIVELY FUNDED AND THE <br />$670,000 FROM TAX ANTICIPATION NOTES, THE CHAIRMAN STATED THEY WERE IN- <br />FORMED THAT THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO POSSIBLE CHANCE OF RECEIVING ADDITIONA. <br />FUNDING OVER THE TENTATIVE $365,000,, AND THAT IF WE APPLIED FOR THE FULL <br />$670,000, WE WOULD BE INDICATING THAT WE COULD NOT SCALE THE PROJECT DOWN <br />OR COME UP WITH THE EXTRA FUNDS, AND WE WOULD STAND A CHANCE OF LOSING <br />THE $365,000. THEY,� THEREFORE, SUBMITTED THE OTHER APPLICATION AND <br />SWITCHED THE SCHOOL BOARD'S ENDORSEMENT OVER TO IT. <br />44 <br />BOOK 30 pAGF 271 �'I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.