My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/27/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
9/27/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:41 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 9:01:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/27/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HEARD TODAY SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT IS THE WATER THAT WILL BE MADE AVAIL- <br />ABLE TO THESE PEOPLE. HE CONTINUED THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE THE ABILITY <br />TO PAY FOR SUCH WATER AND ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR IT, AND HE WOULD HOPE <br />THEY CAN RECEIVE IT. <br />ATTORNEY GATLIN CALLED MR. FOX FOR FURTHER QUESTIONING IN <br />REGARD TO THE SECTIONS OF PIPE, EXHIBITS 17 AND 18, AND ASKED HIM IF THE <br />CLAY OR DIRT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPE WOULD HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH <br />THE QUALITY OR ADEQUACY OF THE PIPE. <br />MR.FOX STATED THAT IT WOULD NOT, <br />ATTORNEY GATLIN THEN NOTED THAT ON THE INSIDE OF THE PIPE THERE <br />IS SOME DRY, RUST-COLORED DEPOSITS AND SOME OTHER DIRT, AND ASKED MR, <br />FOX TO EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT WHEN THE PIPE IS ACTUALLY IN SERVICE <br />AS DISTINGUISHED FROM BEING OUT OF THE GROUND FOR SEVERAL DAYS AND <br />DRIED OUT. <br />MR. FOX NOTED THAT BOTH PIPES ARE ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME AND <br />BOTH HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE GROUND FOR SOME TIME AND ARE NOW DRY. BECAUSE <br />OF THIS, THE DEPOSIT WILL EASILY FLAKE OFF, BUT WHEN THE WATER IS RUNNING <br />THROUGH THE PIPE, THIS IS NOT THE CASE. HE FELT THIS IS BORNE OUT BY <br />THE CHEMICAL ANALYSES THE COUNTY HAD DONE IN THAT TURBIDITY WAS NOT <br />REFLECTED. MR. FOX NOTED THAT IF THESE DEPOSITS WERE BEING FLAKED OFF <br />INTO THE WATER, IT WOULD SHOW UP IN TURBIDITY, WHICH REFLECTS FINE_ <br />PARTICLES IN SUSPENSION AS OPPOSED TO COLOR WHICH REFLECTS PARTICLES IN <br />A COLLOIDAL STATE. HE FELT THIS INDICATES THAT THE SEQUESTERING AND THE <br />RUST INHIBITOR IS FORMING A CHEMICAL REACTION WITH THE WATER AND COATING <br />THE INSIDE OF THE PIPE AND CONTAINING THE DEPOSIT. <br />ATTORNEY GATLIN ASKED MR. FOX IF THIS PIPE WAS IN SERVICE WHETHER <br />THE WATER WOULD BE SAFE AND WHETHER HE WOULD DRINK IT. <br />MR. FOX SAID "LET US SAY THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK I WOULD <br />NOT." MR. FOX CONTINUED THAT HE FOUND IT SURPRISING THAT AFTER THIS <br />LENGTH OF TIME THAT THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE HAS BEEN DECREASED SO LITTLE, <br />ONLY 1.5 To 2.0 REDUCTION WHICH IS EXTREMELY GOOD. <br />ATTORNEY GATLIN ASKED IF MR. FOX WOULD SAY THE PIPES ARE IN A <br />NORMAL CONDITION, AND MR. FOX FELT THEY.WERE BETTER THAN NORMAL. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED.THAT THE TESTS THE COUNTY HAD DONE <br />DO NOT MONITOR TURBIDITY. <br />MR. FOX FELT THAT IF TURBIDITY DID NOT APPEAR ON THE REPORT, IT <br />20 <br />T Fj, <br />SEP 2' 1977 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.