My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/5/1977 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
10/5/1977 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:41 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 9:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/05/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WILL BE READY FRIDAY AND THIS SET IS SUBJECT TO MINOR BRUSH -UP, BUT <br />HE WOULD LIKE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO BE ACCEPTED BEFORE THE <br />BID IS TAKEN. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR <br />WORK UNDER THE EDA GRANT AS PRESENTED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEERS AND <br />PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR. <br />_DR. SMITH NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE AGREEMENT FOR <br />ENGINEERING SERVICES AS REQUIRED BY THE FHA, HE INFORMED THE BOARD <br />THAT AFTER DISCUSSING THIS WITH THE FHA, THEY HAVE AGREED TO GO BACK <br />TO THE AGREEMENT OF DEC. 20, 1972, WHICH THE ENGINEERS HAVE WITH THE <br />COUNTY, AND MODIFY THAT AGREEMENT IN SUCH A FORM AS TO DESIGNATE THE <br />TWO PROJECTS NOW UNDER WAY AND SPELL OUT THE ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILI- <br />TIES, AUTHORITIES AND FEES. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE PREPARED FOR <br />THE BOARDS CONSIDERATION MODIFICATION No. 1 AND N0. 2 ON THE STANDARD <br />FHA FORMS. DR. SMITH NOTED THAT MODIFICATION N0, 2 WILL ALLOW THEM TO <br />GET STARTED ON THE TRANSMISSION LINE TO GIFFORD, TO AWARD THE CONTRACT, <br />AND PROVIDE CASUAL SUPERVISION AND RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION DURING CON- <br />STRUCTION HE CONTINUED THAT AT THE SUGGESTION OF FHA, THEY HAVE <br />COMPUTED WHAT THE FEE'WOULD BE UNDER THEIR FEE SCHEDULE, DEDUCTED <br />FROM THAT FEE THE AMOUNT THEY HAVE INVOICED FOR SERVICES TO DATE, <br />AND PRESENTED A LUMP SUM QUOTATION TO COMPLETE THIS PART OF THE WORK. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHETHER THIS COVERS WHAT WE HAVE <br />REFERRED TO AS THE EDA PROJECT AND IF SO, WHETHER THESE ARE ELIGIBLE <br />COSTS UNDER THE EDA GRANT. <br />DR. SMITH STATED THAT IT DOES, AND THE COSTS ARE ELIGIBLE <br />UNDER THE GRANT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED WHAT RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION COVERS. <br />DR. SMITH INFORMED HIM THAT IT MEANS PUTTING A MAN ON THE <br />JOB 100% OF THE TIME TO SUPERVISE AND KEEP':RECORDS WHILE THE WORK IS <br />BEING DONE, AND THIS IS REQUIRED -BY FHA.. THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL <br />COORDINATOR POINTED OUT THAT IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR, <br />ALL THIS WORK WOULD HAVE TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- <br />SIONERS. <br />32 <br />a <br />,f <br />0 CT 5 1977 <br />st <br />014 <br />dJL PAGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.