My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/2/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
11/2/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:42 AM
Creation date
6/3/2015 12:53:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,. SECONDED.BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO FILE A VALIDA- <br />TION SUIT IN REGARD TO THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE AND COUNTY PLANNER <br />BRENNAN ATTENDED A MEETING AT CITY HALL IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITY <br />OF THE COUNTY EMPLOYING A TRAFFIC ENGINEER JOINTLY WITH THE CITY OF <br />-VERO BEACH. HE REPORTED THAT LESTER SOLIN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE <br />CITY, WOULD LIKE THE COUNTY TO APPLY JOINTLY WITH THE CITY FOR,A <br />TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GRANT FROM THE GOVERNORS HIGHWAY SAFETY COM- <br />MISSION. MR. SOLIN FEELS HAVING A TRAFFIC ENGINEER WOULD PROVIDE THE <br />COUNTY AND THE CITY WITH STRONGER BACK-UP INFORMATION WHEN THERE IS <br />A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE DOT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT WE HAVE HAD DIFFERNECES <br />OF OPINION OVER THE YEARS WITH THE DOT AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ABLE TO <br />RESOLVE THEM. THE ADMINISTRATOR POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL <br />MAJOR TRAFFIC PROJECTS IN PROCESS AT THE PRESENT TIME THAT WILL <br />DEFINITELY AFFECT TRAFFIC PATTERNS IN THE FUTURE, AND HE DOES NOT <br />FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME TO GET INTO A DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE AGREED. HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY'S RESPON- <br />SIBILITY IN THIS REGARD IS CONSIDERABLY DIFFERENT THAN THE MUNICI- <br />PALITY TS, AND FELT THAT ALTHOUGH WE NEED TO COORDINATE WITH THE CITY <br />ON TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED THROUGH THE CITY, HE WOULD PREFER TO <br />KEEP OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE -DOT AS IT IS WHERE WE CAN SIT DOWN <br />AND WORK WITH THEM ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS INSTEAD OF HAVING A CITY - <br />COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DO THIS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT BOTH THE CITY AND THE <br />COUNTY HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT AND FELT <br />THAT THE INFORMATION THAT IS AVAILABLE TODAY SHOULD BE COORDINATED <br />BEFORE WE GO AFTER A FEDERAL GRANT. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY.AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO NOTIFY THE <br />CITY OF VERO BEACH THAT THE BOARD AT THIS TIME CONSIDERS IT PREMATURE <br />TO ENTER INTO A JOINT TRAFFIC STUDY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REQUESTED THAT AN EMERGENCY ITEM <br />BE ADDED TO TODAYjS AGENDA IN REGARD TO AN OFFICER FOR LITTER CONTROL. <br />im <br />21977 Boob 311 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.