My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
11/16/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:42 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 9:27:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROPERTY a <br />IS LOCATED WEST OF 66TH AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE MAIN CANAL. <br />THE MAJORITY OF THE LAND IS IN GROVE'S AND IS DESIGNATED ON THE COMPRE- <br />HENSIVE PLAN AS PRIMARY CITRUS. MR. BERG NOTED THAT THERE ARE SOME <br />EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS IN.PRIMARY CITRUS AND STATED THAT THE ZONING 4 <br />COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THE REZONING FROM A TO R-lE BASED ON THE FACT <br />THAT THERE ALREADY WAS SOME EXISTING EROSION INTO THE PRIMARY CITRUS <br />AREA. MR. BERG STATED THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS DEEDED TO THE FAMILY BY <br />THE FATHER OF THE APPLICANTS. <br />ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROPERTY <br />AT ONE TIME WAS ZONED R-1, BUT THEN WAS CHANGED TO AGRICULTURAL IN THE <br />ROUTE 60 REZONING. <br />MR. BERG SHOWED THE BOARD A SKETCH OF HOW THIS PROPERTY WAS <br />SUBDIVIDED BY DEED, AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE OWNERS WOULD HAVE <br />TO SUBDIVIDE AND PLAT THIS PROPERTY. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT IT WOULD <br />-BE NECESSARY TO HAVE A SO' ROAD INSTEAD OF A 30' ROAD. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD, <br />ROBERT MCIVER OF 325 16TH AVENUE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />MR.°OSGOWICZ DIVIDED THIS PROPERTY UP BY METES AND BOUNDS AND HAD IT <br />RECORDED BEFORE THE REZONING WAS DONE. HE STATED THAT THEY HAD RECEIVED <br />NO OBJECTIONS TO THEIR PLANS TO SUBDIVIDE FROM THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM AND <br />FURTHER NOTED THAT SOME OF THE SURROUNDING LAND IS BEING USED FOR PASTURE <br />LAND AND VERO LAB IS LOCATED NEARBY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ASKED IF ALL THE LOTS SHOWN ARE OWNED <br />BY SEPARATE INDIVIDUALS, AND MR. MCIVER STATED THAT THERE ARE FIVE OWNERS <br />AND THE LAND WAS DEEDED TO THEM IN 1973, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THEY HAD TAKEN AERIAL SPRAYING <br />INTO CONSIDERATION AS THEY ARE SURROUNDED.BY GROVES. <br />MR. MCIVER STATED THAT THEY HAD AND NOTED THAT WHEN MR. OSGOWICZ <br />BOUGHT THIS LAND, THE GROVE WAS NONPRODUCTIVE. <br />'ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER. <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />.Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 77-31 GRANTING THE REQUESTED <br />REZONING TO R-lE. <br />Noy 161977 . . <br />24 <br />BOOK' 32�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.