My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
11/16/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:42 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 9:27:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />x <br />i <br />� c <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE FILING <br />` OF A CEASE & DESIST ORDER ON RICHARD MARTIN FOR VIOLATION OF THE MINING <br />ORDINANCE. HE STATED THAT HE HAS A LETTER FROM ATTORNEY BLOCK, REPRE- <br />SENTING MR. MARTIN, REQUESTING THAT THE OPERATION BE REINSTATED. HE <br />FURTHER STATED THAT HE HAS AN APPEAL FROM HENRY A. FISCHER AND RICHARD <br />DOZIER, REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY SHERMAN•SMITH, AND A REQUEST FOR CONTINU- <br />ANCE ON THIS SAME MATTER. <br />x <br />ATTORNEY SMITH WITHDREW HIS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THERE WERE DEFINITE <br />VIOLATIONS IN THE AREA MR. MARTIN WAS MINING, AND DR. FISCHER HAD CALLED <br />ASKING THAT THESE VIOLATIONS BE CORRECTED. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED <br />THAT HE MET WITH MR. AND MRS. MARTIN THREE TIMES AND STILL THE VIOLATIONS <br />WERE NOT CORRECTED S0, AFTER DISCUSSING THE MATTER WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS, <br />HE ISSUED THE CEASE & DESIST ORDER, KNOWING THAT THIS WOULD CREATE A <br />HARDSHIP ON THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, DR, FISCHER, AND ALSO ON MR. MARTIN. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF ISSUING THIS ORDER WAS TO <br />BRING THE SITUATION TO A POINT WHERE IT COULD BE STRAIGHTENED OUT ONCE <br />AND FOR ALL. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONTINUED THAT WHILE MR. MARTIN WAS <br />ATTEMPTING TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION, IT WAS BROUGHT TO HIS ATTENTION <br />THAT THE BASIS THE ORDER WAS ISSUED ON WAS INCORRECT DUE TO A MISUNDER- <br />STANDING BETWEEN MR, MARTIN AND MR. HYATT AS TO WHERE THE BOUNDARY LINE <br />OF THE PROPERTY WAS LOCATED. HE NOTED THAT THE ONLY ONE NOT SHUT DOWN <br />AT THIS TIME IS MR. HYATT, THE ADMINISTRATOR INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />HE HAS A LETTER FROM DANA HOWARD, SURVEYOR, TO ATTORNEY BLOCK STATING <br />THAT THEIR FIRM HAS COMPLETED A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY AND RELOCATED <br />BOUNDARY MARKERS AND FIND THERE WAS A VIOLATION OF THE ISO' SETBACK <br />LIMITS, BUT INSTEAD OF THE VIOLATION EXTENDING TO WITHIN 19' OF THE LINE, <br />IT ACTUALLY IS LOO' AWAY. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE INSPECTED THE PROPERTY YESTER- <br />DAY. IT IS BEING RESTORED, AND HE FEELS"THERE IS SUFFICIENT MATERIAL <br />THERE FOR'MR. MARTIN TO BRING THE OPERATION INTO COMPLETE CONFORMANCE <br />WITHOUT A LOT. MORE WORK. THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT THE RELOCATION <br />26 ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.