My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-062
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2014
>
2014-062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2018 4:20:40 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:14:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2014-062
Approved Date
07/08/2014
Agenda Item Number
13.A.
Resolution Type
Roadways
Entity Name
Mitchell vs Brady and Indian River County
Surf Colony
Subject
Lawsuit Sea Turtle Lane Platted as Tamrich Road now Sea Turtle Lane
Area
Plat of Surf Colony
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13433
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2014-062 <br />filed, to wit: Mitchell, et al. v. Bradv, et al., Case No. 2006-0759 CA -13, <br />Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Indian River County, Florida; and <br />WHEREAS, Indian River County was joined as a defendant in the lawsuit <br />by the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff claimed the County may have some remote interest <br />in the road by virtue of the vague dedication language on the Surf Colony Plat; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, in order to resolve this issue, the parties entered into a <br />mediation agreement which, among other things, County agreed to renounce any <br />interest the County may have had with regard to the road and 4400t walkway; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, in the Abandonment Reversion Agreement found in Book <br />2745, Page 1631; Grant of Easements recorded in Book 2745, Page 1650; <br />Roadway Maintenance and Construction Agreement recorded in Book 2745, <br />Page 1677; and the Walkway Maintenance Agreement recorded in Book 2745, <br />Page 1708, Public Records of Indian River County, the County agreed to <br />denounce any interest it may have in the road and walkway in order to be <br />dismissed from the suit and comply with the mediation agreement, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: <br />1. The above "WHEREAS" clauses are true and correct, and are <br />hereby adopted as findings of the Board. <br />2. The Board hereby formally denounces any interest it has presumed <br />to have held in (1) that certain roadway depicted on the plat of Surf <br />Colony <br />subdivision as Tamrich Road (now known as Sea Turtle Lane), and (2) that <br />certain 4400t walkway depicted along the northern portion of Surf Colony <br />subdivision, as there were no express dedications contained in said plat for these <br />areas, nor has Indian River County ever maintained or improved either said <br />roadway or walkway. <br />3. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of Indian <br />River County, Florida as an inducement to be dropped as a defendant from <br />Mitchell, et al. v. Bradv, et al., Case No. 2006-0759 CA -13, Nineteenth Judicial <br />Circuit, in and for Indian River County, Florida and to comply with that <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.