My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/8/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
2/8/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:06 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:05:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/08/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE LOWER BID OF $5,025 FROM <br />THE .JACK M. BERRY COMPANY AS THERE IS NO ACCESS TO THIS PROPERTY <br />EXCEPT BY WATER, AND THE .JACK BERRY COMPANY, WHICH SURROUNDS THIS <br />PROPERTY, WILL DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY WHICH WILL GENERATE ADDITIONAL <br />TAX REVENUE FOR THE COUNTY. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE PROPERTY HAS A <br />LIMITED VALUE WITH LIMITED INGRESS OR EGRESS AND FELT IT COULD BE <br />SUBJECT TO APPEAL BEFORE THE PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF .JACK M. BERRY <br />COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,025.00 ON THE SW 1/4 OF TRACT 715 LESS <br />`i'HE W 92.25`, CONTAINING 7.9 ACRES LOCATED IN FELLSMERE FARMS CO. <br />SUBDIVISION. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO THE VALUE OF LOT 29, BLOCK 22, <br />ROYAL PARK SUBDIVISION, AND IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE BIDS <br />RECEIVED WERE TOO LOW, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY REJECTED ALL BIDS ON LOT 29, BLOCK 22, <br />ROYAL PARK SUBDIVISION, AND AGREED TO READVERTISE. <br />ATTORNEY MICHAEL O`HAIRE APPEARED REPRESENTING GEORGE ANIi <br />MARY ESTER BOLLIS IN REGARD TO OBTAINING A VARIANCE SO THAT THEY <br />MIGHT BUILD ON THEIR PROPERTY. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE OWNED THIS <br />PROPERTY IN J. ELM.O COOK SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS -AN UNRECORDED SUBDI- <br />VISION, OVER 20 YEARS,AND LOTS HAVE BEEN SOLD AND HOMES BUILT IN THIS <br />SUBDIVISION THROUGH ALL THE INTERVENING YEARS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT, IN THIS CASE, WE ARE NOT DEAL- <br />ING WITH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ORDINANCE 74-20 AS THEY ARE NOT SUB- <br />DIVIDING PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT ON A DEDICATED HIGHWAY. HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE DOES PROVIDE THAT THE BOARD MAY GRANT <br />A VARIANCE, AND HE WOULD NAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE BOARD ISSUING <br />A VARIANCE TO MR. & MRS. BOLLIS SO THEY CAN BUILD ON THEIR.PROPERTY. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TO GEORGE AND MARY ESTER BOLLIS A <br />VARIANCE TO THE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY <br />13 <br />FEB 81978 � ���� �� <br />4411 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.