My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/8/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
3/8/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:06 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:08:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/08/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE MONEY FOR THIS PROPOSED <br />REMODELING IS IN THE SHERIFF'S BUDGET. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT AT BUDGET TIME IT WAS STATED <br />THERE WERE TO BE NO MAJOR CHANGES AT THE JAIL IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE, <br />SHE FELT, HOWEVER, THAT THIS REMODELING IS PROBABLY NECESSARY AND <br />WOULD MAKE IT A MORE CONVENIENT AND EFFICIENT ARRANGEMENT, BUT POINTED <br />OUT THAT SETTING UP THE COLLECTOR STATIONS IS TERRIBLY IMPORTANT, AND <br />SHE WOULD NOT WANT TO TAKE OUR MEN OFF THOSE JOBS. SHE ASKED THE <br />ATTORNEY WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE AN ARCHITECT FOR THIS PROJECT, <br />WHICH IS STRICTLY RENOVATIONS, BEFORE PUTTING IT OUT FOR BIDS. <br />THE ATTORNEY FELT THE ONLY REASON AN ARCHITECT MIGHT BE NEEDED <br />WOULD BE TO MAKE SURE IT COMPLIES WITH THE BUILDING REGULATIONS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS FELT WE WOULD HAVE TO DISCUSS THIS <br />WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, AND THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NOTED <br />THAT THERE IS NO ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING WORK INVOLVED. MR. NELSON <br />EXPLAINED THAT THE PROPOSED RENOVATION IS MEANT TO CONSOLIDATE THE <br />DISPATCHER AND DESK SERGEANT IN ONE ROOM. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRA- <br />TOR TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY INFORMATION FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND <br />PUT THIS WORK OUT FOR BID. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS FELT MORE SPECIFIC PLANS <br />SHOULD BE DRAWN TO BE CERTAIN THIS RENOVATION DOES NOT TURN OUT TO BE <br />CONSIDERABLY MORE EXPENSIVE THAN ESTIMATED. THE BOARD AGREED THIS <br />MATTER SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH THE SHERIFF AND ALSO THE BUILDING DE- <br />PARTMENT TO DETERMINE JUST WHAT IS REQUIRED IN REGARD TO PERMITTING, ETC. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS BROUGHT UP THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE <br />COUNTY AND THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE IN REGARD TO THE 51 ACRES <br />ON ORCHID ISLAND IN WABASSO. HE STATED HE DID NOT FEEL THERE WAS <br />ANYTHING IN IT TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE LOCAL CITIZENRY TO USE THE <br />PREMISES. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON VARIOUS POSSIBILITIES, INCLUDING <br />HAVING SOME TYPE OF REVERTER CLAUSE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE IS A <br />MEETING PLANNED WHERE MORE INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED, AND THE BOARD <br />AGREED TO HOLD UP ON THIS MATTER. <br />24 <br />BOOK 34 PAGE 106 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.