My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/22/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
3/22/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:06 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:09:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/22/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED <br />AND READ: <br />MINTON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FORT PIERCE <br />INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER SCOUT PICKUP TRUCK <br />DELIVERY 30-45 DAYS (INCLUDING TRADE-IN) $5,247.75 <br />ALTERNATE BID - <br />INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER SCOUT PICKUP TRUCK <br />IN STOCK AND WITH MORE OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT, <br />(INCLUDING TRADE-IN) $5,631.72 <br />FRED'COYNE CHEVROLET, VERO BEACH <br />CHEVROLET C-10 PICKUP TRUCK <br />DELIVERY 60 DAYS (INCLUDING TRADE-IN) $4,178.91 <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED <br />TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION. <br />CITY -COUNTY BUILDING DIRECTOR, ESTHER RYMER, CAME BEFORE <br />THE BOARD TO DISCUSS A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A BUILDING <br />BOARD OF APPEALS. MRS. RYMER REQUESTED THAT THE COMMISSIONERS CON- <br />SIDER APPOINTING SUCH A BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATING DIS- <br />PUTES AS -WELL AS'MAKING INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE. SHE <br />STATED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DID PASS THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, COPIES <br />OF WHICH WERE SUPPLIED TO THE BOARD, BUT WITH A FEW CHANGES. THEY <br />ASKED FOR A MEMBERSHIP OF 7 INSTEAD OF 5. THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE <br />CALLED FOR AN ARCHITECT, CIVIL ENGINEER AND GENERAL CONTRACTORS AS <br />MEMBERS OF THE BUILDING POARD OF APPEALS, AND THE CITY CHANGED IT TO <br />INCLUDE THE CITY ENGINEER AS A VOTING MEMBER AND THE REMAINING MEMBERS <br />ALL TO BE OF PROFESSIONAL OR BUSINESS BACKGROUND, NOT NECESSARILY IN <br />THE BUILDING INDUSTRY. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS HAVE MET WITH MRS, RYMER IN THIS REGARD, AND THEY DO FEEL <br />THERE REALLY IS A NEED FOR A BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS BECAUSE THE <br />PRESENT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS DOES NOT HAVE THE TECHNICAL ABILITY TO <br />TO MAKE THIS TYPE OF DECISION ON THE BUILDING CODE. HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THE REQUEST WAS THAT THE COUNTY UTILIZE THE APPEALS BOARD AS <br />SET UP BY THE CITY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE RECOGNIZES THE <br />NEED FOR SUCH A BOARD, BUT HAS SOME STRONG FEELINGS THAT THE COUNTY <br />11 <br />LIAR 2 2 1978 <br />d� 4 FAGE132 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.