Laserfiche WebLink
v <br />+ w <br />i P <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE QUORUM REQUIRED, AND COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT AS IT IS SET UP, IF ONLY FOUR MEMBERS WERE <br />PRESENT, YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE FOUR POSITIVE VOTES, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT COUNTY APPEALS COULD NOT <br />BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE ITS <br />OWN APPOINTMENTS. HE FELT THE IDEA OF THIS BOARD IS GOOD AND IT <br />SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED, BUT THAT IT IS UNWORKABLE AS NOW SUGGESTED <br />WITH THE CITY APPOINTMENTS. THE BOARD AGREED THEY COULD NOT GO ALONG <br />WITH THE APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY.ENGINEER. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE REQUESTED BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER TO SUPPLY <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS WITH INFORMATION ON THE CHANGES.MADE IN THE ORDINANCE <br />BY THE CITY AND ALSO THE APPOINTMENTS WHEN THEY ARE MADE, AND IN THE <br />MEANTIME WE WILL DO SOME FURTHER STUDY ON THE MATTER. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE FOLLOWING LETTER <br />RECIEVED FROM THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD IN <br />REGARD TO REPLACEMENT OF A WRECKED AMBULANCE: <br />MAR. 2 21979 <br />13 <br />Box. 34 A <br />