Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />go <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE RE— <br />VIEWED THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND FEEL THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS A <br />.GOOD ONE, BUT WOULD LIKE THE ATTORNEY TO CLARIFY SOME OF THE WORDING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD MIGHT WISH TO REFER <br />THIS TO THE VARIOUS RELATED COUNTY AGENCIES BEFORE TAKING ACTION ON IT. <br />THE BOARD AGREED. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT HE HAD PREVIOUSLY RAISED <br />QUESTIONS ABOUT THE AFFECT THIS WILL HAVE ON EXISTING STRUCTURES. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT SECTION 2 (B) OF THE PRO— <br />POSED ORDINANCE STATES THAT SUCH SITUATIONS SHALL BE REMEDIED AS <br />SPECIFIED BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE ATTORNEY <br />TO CLARIFY THE WORDING AS REQUESTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR`S OFFICE. THIS <br />MATTER THEN WILL BE TAKEN UP AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AND REPRESEN— <br />TATIVES FROM THE VARIOUS FIRE GROUPS IN THE COUNTY INVITED TO ATTEND. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND ENGINEER <br />BEINDORF MET WITH CITY MANAGER LITTLE IN REGARD TO INJECTION OF SEWAGE <br />FROM THE GIFFORD AREA INTO THE CITY FLOW SYSTEM AT LIFT STATION #1. <br />HE STATED THAT MR. LITTLE FAVORED THIS IDEA, BUT ADVISED THEM THAT <br />FURTHER ENGINEERING STUDIES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO DETERMINE WHETHER <br />THE CITY SYSTEM CAN HANDLE IT AT THIS POINT. A LETTER HAS BEEN RE— <br />CEIVED FROM CITY ENGINEER LLOYD SETTING OUT THE COST FOR DEVELOPING <br />THIS INFORMATION AS FOLLOWS: <br />27 <br />P 19 <br />��� BOOK P34 Tw272 <br />