My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/14/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
5/14/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINE- <br />TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. <br />CASE NO. 77-1045 <br />MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., ) 4 <br />Petitioner, ) <br />VS. ) <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ) <br />OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, <br />Respondent <br />O R D E R <br />Petitioner, Mid -Florida Utilities, Inc., seeks review <br />I <br />by certiorari of Respondent, Board of County Commissioners of <br />Indian River County, Florida Resolution No. 77-111, which denied <br />Petitioner's application for authority to increase its water <br />rates to customers in Indian River County, Florida. <br />r <br />This case arose out of an application for a water <br />rate increase initially filed by Petitioner, Mid -Florida, under <br />a franchise known as the "Rockridge Water and Sewer Franchise.". <br />Mid -Florida claims a fair rate of return would be 10.9%; that <br />its proposed rates would produce that fair rate of return and <br />that the rates presently being charged by Mid -Florida were not <br />producing any rate of return, and therefore, were confiscatory. <br />.Mid -Florida also contends that the Respondent Board is without <br />authority to consider the quality of service and the quality of <br />r; <br />water in determining whether or not Mid -Florida's application <br />..for rate increase should be granted. Mid -Florida is also <br />claiming that the Board departed from essential requirements of <br />law and failed to give any consideration.to the financial needs <br />of Mid -Florida and its denial of Mid -Florida's application for <br />rate increase deprived Mid -Florida of its property without just <br />compensation in violation of guarantees of the Florida and <br />Federal constitution. Mid -Florida is asking the Court to order <br />the Board to.grant the rate increase it asked for and to find <br />that a fair and reasonable rate of -return for Mid -Florida is <br />10.9%, and that the rate increase.go into effect immediately. <br />1978 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.