5/14/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT WHEN THIS PROPERTY WAS PUT ON RECORD IN 1925, IT WAS IN THE CITY, BUT THEN THE CITY PULLED IN THEIR LIMITS, AND THE PROPERTY BECAME LOCATED IN THE COUNTY. ADMIN— ISTRATOR JENNINGS CONTINUED THAT MR.,,LLOYD'S CLIENT, ORIN CUMMINGS, WISHES TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY AND BUILD ROADS TO COUNTY SPECIFICA— TIONS. HE NOTED THAT HE SUGGESTED TO MR. LLOYD THAT THEY REPLAT THE PROPERTY, BUT APPARENTLY THEY DO NOT WISH TO. THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT HE TOLD MR. LLOYD THE COUNTY WOULD WANT EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE, AND MR. LLOYD AGREED THAT THEY WILL GIVE 15' EASEMENTS AND BUILD ROADS TO COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER ANYONE COULD GET PERMISSION FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO BUILD ON THESE LOTS, WHICH ARE ABOUT 70' LOTS. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT PEOPLE WITH LOTS IN EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS CAN GET SEPTIC TANK PERMITS, AND THIS IS AN EXISTING SUB— DIVISION. THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT THIS SUBDIVISION WAS LEFT UNDEVELOPED ALL THESE YEARS, BUT NOW WILL BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. HE STATED THAT MR, LLOYD APPAR— ENTLY WANTS TO KNOW IF THE COUNTY WILL ACCEPT 15' EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES AND ACCEPT THE ROADS FOR MAINTENANCE WITHOUT REQUIRING REPLATTING. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT KNOW OF ANY REASON THIS COULDN'T BE DONE, BUT FELT THE COUNTY HAS AN INDEPENDENT DECISION TO MAKE AS TO WHETHER THEY WILL ACCEPT THE ROADS. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THE ROADS SHOULD BE RE—DEDICATED TO THE COUNTYa CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THEY REALLY SHOULD REPLAT, ESPECIALLY AS THE DEVELOPER OWNS ALL THE PROPERTY, AND ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT HE ALSO WOULD PREFER IT, BUT POINTED OUT THAT IF IT WERE REPLATTED, THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE 1/2 ACRE LOTS IN ORDER TO GET SEPTIC TANK PERMITS. 40 MAY 2 -41978 BOOK 35 PAcF 40