My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/7/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
6/7/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:17:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/07/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOT INCLUDED IN THE FIRST HEARING BECAUSE OF A PROBLEM WITH PROPER <br />NOTICE. 14HEN IT DID COME UP FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE <br />PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, MR. COTTON OPPOSED THE SUGGESTED <br />REZONING FROM C-lA To R -2C THROUGH HIS ATTORNEY, MICHAEL O'HAIRE, <br />AND THE ZONING BOARD DID NOT REZONE THE PROPERTY. .ATTORNEY COLLINS <br />CONTINUED THAT HIS MATTER IS ON OUR AGENDA TODAY BECAUSE IT HAS <br />BEEN ADVERTISED, BUT ACTUALLY A HEARING IS NOT NECESSARY, <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO FORMAL <br />APPEAL OF THE REZONING DENIAL, BUT HE FELT A MOTION SUSTAINING <br />THE ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD WOULD BE IN ORDER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL ANY FORMAL ACTION IS NECESSARY <br />BECAUSE THIS MATTER IS NOT OFFICIALLY OR FORMALLY BEFORE THE BOARD AT <br />THIS TIME. <br />ATTORNEY O'HAIRE STATED THAT SINCE.THIS MATTER HAS BEEN <br />ADVERTISED, HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE <br />RECOMMENDATION OF THE ZONING COMMISSION THAT THE REZONING BE DENIED, <br />AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH <br />THAT. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER Loy, TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND <br />ZONING COMMISSION FOR DENIAL OF REZONING OF LOT 125, UNIT II, THE <br />MOORINGS SUBDIVISION, TO R -2C. <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD AT <br />LEAST HEAR THE PRESENTATION AND THEN MAKE THEIR OWN DETERMINATION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT SINCE THIS MATTER HAS NOT <br />BEEN APPEALED TO THE BOARD, HE DID NOT FEEL THIS WOULD BE <br />APPROPRIATE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AGREED THAT WHOEVER INIATED.THE REQUEST <br />FOR THE ZONING CHANGE WOULD HAVE TO APPEAL IT TO THE BOARD.' <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG POINTED OUT THAT THE PLANNING & <br />ZONING COMMISSION IS AN ADVISORY BOARD AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY. HE FELT THE BOARD MIGHT BE <br />SETTING A PRECEDENT, <br />26 <br />JUN 71978 <br />BoX 35 PAvi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.