My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/7/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
6/7/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:17:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/07/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS AGREED THAT THE PAY GRADE SITUATION <br />CAN BE TAKEN CARE OF DURING THE YEAR, AND SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD <br />JUST CONSIDER THE COST -OF -LIVING INCREASE AT THIS TIME. HE FELT <br />MOST EMPLOYEES ARE PRETTY WELL IN THEIR PROPER GRADES AND CHANGES <br />CAN BE CONSIDERED WHEN THEY ARE MERITED. <br />THE BOARD CONTINUED TO DISCUSS SUGGESTED PERCENTAGES <br />FOR THE COST -OF -LIVING INCREASE RANGING FROM 5% TO 7%. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS POINTED OUT THAT <br />IF YOU HAVE SOMEONE EARNING $10,000 AND SOMEONE EARNING $16,000, <br />THE ONE EARNING THE LARGER AMOUNT GETS A LARGER INCREASE EVEN <br />THOUGH THEY BOTH MAY HAVE THE SAME EXPENSES. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT BROUGHT UP THE POSSIBILITY OF SETTING <br />AN ARBITRARY FIGURE OF $15,000, AND EVERYONE EARNING OVER THAT <br />WOULD GET A 5% INCREASE AND ANYONE EARNING LESS WOULD GET A 7% <br />INCREASE. IT WAS GENERALLY FELT THIS WOULD BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE <br />TO ADMINISTER. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE VALUE OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, <br />FRINGE BENEFITS, ETC, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO <br />ACCEPT A FIGURE OF 6% IF WE COULD AGREE THAT, IF THERE IS ANY WAY <br />POSSIBLE, WE WILL SET ASIDE SOME EXTRA FUNDS -IN THE BUDGET AND <br />COMMIT OURSELVES TO MAKING A MID -YEAR PAY GRADE ANALYSIS WITH <br />POSSIBLE MID -YEAR ADJUSTMENTS IN PAY GRADES. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED SHE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH <br />A COMMITMENT TO A RE-EVALUATION, BUT DID NOT FEEL THE MONEY <br />COULD BE SET ASIDE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE DID NOT FEEL IT WOULD BE WISE TO LET <br />OUR EMPLOYEES THINK THERE MIGHT BE RAISES AT MID YEAR. <br />COMMISSIONER.SCHMUCKER AGREED THAT WE COULD TAKE THIS UP <br />AGAIN LATER IN THE YEAR TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, BUT <br />DID NOT FEEL THAT IT SHOULD BE MADE MANDATORY, <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED TO RECOMMEND <br />A 6% COST OF LIVING INCREASE, BUT NO MERIT INCREASES AND NO STEP <br />INCREASES UNLESS FULLY DOCUMENTED. <br />46 <br />JUN 7197a Boa 35 FAc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.