My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/21/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
6/21/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2019 9:47:34 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:19:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/21/1978
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE PRESENT ALLOCATION, HE BELIEVES THE CAPACITY WOULD SUFFICE FOR <br />THE PRESENT USERS AND THE FUTURE TOO. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT THERE COULD BE ALL SORTS OF <br />PROBLEMS WITH REQUIRING HOOK—UP WHEN SOMEONE IS WITHIN 200' OF <br />THE LINE WHICH HE NOTED COULD BE IN THE NEXT BLOCK OVER. <br />ENGINEER BEINDORF POINTED OUT THAT THIS IS COVERED BECAUSE <br />HOOK—UP IS ONLY MANDATORY IF YOU HAVE PERMISSION TO USE EXISTING <br />EASEMENTS. HE NOTED THE INTENT IS TO GET EVERYBODY WITHIN A <br />CERTAIN DISTANCE OF THE LINE TO TIE IN. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE PEOPLE COMMITTED TO HOOK <br />ONTO THAT LINE NOW ARE SUFFICIENT TO CARRY THE SYSTEM, AND ENGINEER <br />BEINDORF STATED THAT BASED ON THE PRESENT CUSTOMERS, THEY ARE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT INQUIRED IF THE PEOPLE PRESENTLY ON THE <br />SYSTEM ARE COMMITTED TO STAY ON IT, AND ENGINEER BEINDORF SAID HE <br />WOULD ASSUME'SO BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SEPTIC TANKS AND HE DID <br />NOT BELIEVE THE BOARD OF HEALTH WOULD ALLOW A SEPTIC TANK WHEN THEY <br />ARE ON A SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS ON <br />THE SYSTEM, AND ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT AT THE TIME THEY DID <br />THEIR REPORT, THERE WERE 535 CUSTOMERS, AND THOSE CUSTOMERS WOULD BE <br />NEEDED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT WE HAVE MADE AFFIRMATIVE REPORTS <br />TO THE FHA TO JUSTIFY THE LOAN THAT THERE WOULD BE 490 CUSTOMERS. <br />CHAIRMAN VIODTKE DISCUSSED SECTION 5, PARAGRAPH C., WHICH <br />STATES THAT THE BOARD CAN ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH LARGE USERS OF <br />WATER AND NOTED THAT HE ACTUALLY IS OPPOSED TO THIS, BUT CAN SEE <br />AN AREA WHERE A DIFFERENT RATE STRUCTURE MIGHT BE NECESSARY, FOR <br />INSTANCE, WITH REGARD TO THE SCHOOLS AS HE WOULDN'T WANT THE SCHOOLS <br />TO PAY JUST $7.50 A MONTH FOR SEWER. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED FOR <br />AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE THE BOARD MIGHT WANT TO NEGOTIATE WITH A WATER <br />USER, AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE COULDN'T THINK OF ANYWHERE <br />WE MIGHT WANT TO NEGOTIATE ON WATER BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO PAY THE <br />SAME AMOUNT FOR THE WATER, WHETHER IT IS 750,000 GALLONS OR OVER <br />100, 000. <br />JON 211978 101 BOOK 35 PAcr 211 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.