Laserfiche WebLink
HE HAS NO PROBLEM WITH REINSTATING TREASURE COAST, BUT POINTED OUT <br />THAT WE HAVE TO GET INTO A UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THEN IT CERTAINLY <br />WILL BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE TAXPAYERS FOR THIS DEPARTMENT <br />TO DO THIS WORK, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IT IS NOT HIS INTENT TO SEE <br />TREASURE COAST`REMOVED UNLESS THE COUNTY IS IN A POSITION TO SUPPLY <br />THE SAME SERVICE ItIN-HOUSE.�� HE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE CONTRACT <br />HAS BEEN EFFECTIVELY TERMINATED NOW. <br />MR. LOHMAN INQUIRED ABOUT THE TIME FRAME FOR THE COUNTY <br />GETTING INTO THE WATER BUSINESS, AND NOTED THAT IF IT WOULD BE A <br />YEAR OR SO BEFORE THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE AN OPERATOR, HE DID NOT <br />FEEL HE WOULD OBJECT TO THE 30 -DAY TERMINATION CLAUSE BUT WOULD LIKE <br />TO CONSULT HIS ATTORNEY BEFORE GIVING A DEFINITE ANSWER. <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT MR. LOHMAN COULD CONTACT HIS ATTORNEY <br />AND GIVE THEM HIS ANSWER LATER IN THE MEETING. °w <br />juL 91�? <br />,,V <br />