My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
8/9/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:08 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:29:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />NOT TO EXCEED $6,142. MR. THOMAS POINTED OUT THAT IF WE GET MORE <br />PROPOSALS AND SHOULD HAVE A SURPLUS, WE CAN SEND IT BACK, BUT IN THE <br />MEANTIME, HE WILL CONTINUE TO RESEARCH BEFORE THIS IS PUT OUT FOR <br />BID. AGAIN. COORDINATOR THOMAS NOTED THAT THE RAMP WAS APPROVED SUBJECT <br />TO THESE MARKERS BEING INSTALLED. <br />ON -MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, THE BOARD. UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDI- <br />NATOR TO SUBMFT AN -APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />FOR FUNDS NOT TO EXCEED $6,142.00 FROM THE FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT <br />PROGRAM. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REPORTED THAT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />.BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY •COMMITTEE MEETING WAS HELD MONDAY NIGHT, AND THEY <br />HAVE ABOUT $170,000 TO SPEND ON THE ROAD PROGRAM AND ONLY ABOUT THREE <br />MONTHS IN WHICH TO DO IT. HE FELT THIS WILL TAKE AN ALL OUT EFFORT <br />OF THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT, BUT FELT WE COULD FILE FOR AN EX- .. <br />TENSION IF IT BECOMES NECESSARY. HE NOTED THAT THE ROAD PROGRAM WAS <br />APPROVED WELL OVER AND ABOVE THIS EXPENDITURE BACK IN APRIL. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS DID NOT FEEL IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO <br />APPLY FOR AN•EXTENSION IN ORDER TO SPEND THE $170,000 ON ROADS IN THE <br />THREE MONTHS TIME. HE NOTED THAT THE ONLY PROBLEM IS THAT THE APPROVED <br />LIST HAS ROADS ON IT THAT WOULD REQUIRE MOVING OF UTILITIES, ACQUIRING <br />ADDITIONAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ETC. HE CONTINUED THAT IN ORDER TO GET THIS <br />ACCOMPLISHED IN•A HURRY WITH NO EXTENSION, IT IS JUST A MATTER OF PICK- <br />ING OUT THE ROADS WHERE YOU HAVE SUBDIVISIONS AND EXISTING DEDICATED <br />RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WHICH MAY NECESSITATE SKIPPING OVER SOME PRIORITIES. <br />HE STATED THAT THE ROAD THAT HAS THE.DRAINAGE PROBLEM COULDN'T BE <br />WORKED OUT IN TIME. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR PROCEED WITH THE ONES THAT ARE FEASIBLE, BUT COMMISSIONER <br />LOY-POINTED OUT THAT THE COMMITTEE DID SET SOME PRIORITIES. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER SUGGESTED TELLING THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />TO PROCEED WITH ANY ROADS ON THE APPROVED LIST THAT HAVE THE NECESSARY <br />RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND THEN GO BACK TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO SEE IF <br />59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.