My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
10/19/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2018 1:18:49 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 728-787
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
444
Document Relationships
2004-048
(Cover Page)
Path:
\Official Documents\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Bob Bruce <br /> , a member of the Planning & Zoning Commission, expressed his opposition to <br />the radical difference in the footprint of the new plan and reminded the Board that the North Beach <br />Civic Association had previously requested repeatedly that the density in the area be reduced. <br />Requests were made to rezone everything north of CR-510 to single-family. <br /> <br /> Director Boling, in response to questioning, showed pictures of both the original <br />conceptual plan, the plan originally submitted for Ocean Sands and the revised plan which has 5 <br />3-story buildings and 2 1-story structures. <br />Chairman Ginn questioned the placement of the parking garage and noted that one of the <br />pictures appeared to show part of the garage higher than the dune line. <br /> Director Boling responded that was a front elevation picture. Part of the 35-foot height <br />includes the portion of the garage that is above the average natural grade. <br /> Commissioner Neuberger questioned what happened in 1992 with the original conceptual <br />plan and what was permitted to change. <br /> County Attorney Collins noted that the original conceptual plan was approved with <br />parameters. Anytime there are modifications, especially intensification of density, a new public <br />hearing is required. If the plans lessen the density and increase the buffering, no additional public <br />hearing is required. <br />Attorney Barkett <br /> questioned Director Boling as to whether or not this is a modification of <br />the original conceptual plan, and Director Boling responded that it is and has been found to be <br />consistent with the original PD plan. <br /> County Attorney Collins noted that this is not a totally different plan but retains the same <br />restrictions as the original plan. The Board is not here for a zoning matter but is here to look at the <br />preliminary conceptual plan and the site plan approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission. If <br />the plan conforms with development regulations, it should be approved. If not, the Board can deny <br />the plan but distinction as to the reason for denial should be made. <br /> Director Boling confirmed that this current plan has fewer units than the original plan. <br />OCTOBER 19, 2004 31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.