My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/20/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
9/20/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:08 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:32:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/20/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROCK. MR. WEHR CONTINUED THAT HE HAS ARRANGED WITH .JOHN TROGDLEN <br />TO BRING IN SHELL WHEN THE LIMEROCK IS REMOVED, AND IF THE LIMEROCK <br />CAN BE REMOVED, THEY CAN COMPLETE THE COURTS NEXT WEEK. HE NOTED <br />THAT SHELL WAS USED ON THE WABASSO TENNIS COURTS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS ASKED THAT THE RECORD SHOW THAT THE <br />COUNTY DID ALL THE WORK THEY AGREED TO DO, INCLUDING THE PREPARATION <br />AND GRADING OF THE MARL BASE, AND SPREADING OF THE LIMEROCK, AND <br />THEN WERE INFORMED THAT,IT WAS THE WRONG LIMEROCK. HE WANTED IT <br />UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS IS NOT THE COUNTY'S OPERATION OR SYSTEM OF <br />BUILDING THINGS. HE NOTED THAT HIS DEPARTMENT COULD COOPERATE ONCE <br />MORE IN REMOVING THE LIMEROCK, BUT POINTED OUT HOW MUCH IT COSTS TO <br />RUN COUNTY EQUIPMENT UP THERE TIME AFTER TIME AND FURTHER NOTED THAT <br />AFTER REMOVING THE LIMEROCK, THE BASE WOULD HAVE TO BE REGRADED. <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE ADVISABILITY OF USING SHELL INSTEAD <br />OF THE PROPER GRADE OF LIMEROCK, AND ALSO QUESTIONED WHY THE CONTRACTOR <br />PURCHASING THE #9 LIMEROCK COULDN'T TAKE CARE OF LOADING IT OR WHY <br />THE MEN WORKING THERE COULDN'T DO THE LOADING. <br />MR. WEHR STATED THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO SAVE MONEY AND NOTED <br />THAT THERE IS ZOO TONS OF LIMEROCK WHICH WOULD BE TOO MUCH FOR THE <br />MEN TO HANDLE, <br />CHAIRMAN VIODTKE ESTIMATED THAT MR. WEHR WOULD BE ABLE TO <br />RECOVER ONLY ABOUT $900 ON THE ROCK AFTER SPENDING $2,000 FOR IT, <br />AND MR, WEHR NOTED THAT HE HAS ASKED RINKER-TO MAKE UP THE <br />DIFFERENTIAL ON THE LOSS. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT NO CONTRACTS WERE <br />LET ON THIS PROJECT, NO PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED, AND THAT IT WAS DONE <br />IN AN ENTIRELY DISORGANIZED MANNER. IT WAS AGREED,.HOWEVER, THAT THE <br />ROCK MUST BE REMOVED, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO REMOVE <br />b THE LIMEROCK AS REQUESTED AND LOAD IT ON THE TRUCKS OF THE PURCHASER. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE IT UNDERSTOOD <br />THAT THIS IS THE END OF THE COUNTY'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROJECT. <br />19 <br />L_ SEP 2 01918 <br />am 36 em E 223 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.