Laserfiche WebLink
(4) Objective 6, he thought the policy/concept for bio -fuel processing plants was <br />great and staff might want to limit that to AG -2 and AG -3 only and not have <br />the conflict. <br />(5) Under the Policy for construction of reservoirs, he asked if staff was talking <br />about above ground reservoirs with dykes or just talking about calling a <br />mining pit a reservoir. He saw a big difference and felt we needed to specify <br />if we are talking about above ground or ground water. <br />(6) Objective 18.3 , "Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND)", wanted to see <br />more definitions in it, because he thought the current wording "To facilitate <br />TND project east of I-95 the county shall allow portions of TND projects to be <br />located outside of the urban service area." needed to be clearly defined, as <br />"parcel and portions" were too vague. He said, looking at how Liberty Park <br />was done, where they took densities from the inside and transferred it to the <br />outside, he did not think that was good planning. He would rather see the <br />60% tied into as -built on site; so that 60% or more of the project density has to <br />be built inside the Urban Service Area (USA) and the less dense portions of <br />the TND are outside the USA. <br />Vice Chairman Davis, based on comments from Commissioner O'Bryan <br />regarding changes, asked for Director Keating's opinion, from a planning perspective, <br />because he did not know whether the Liberty Park project would have been able to stay in <br />those ramifications had that actually been a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />Director Keating, responding to comments regarding the Liberty Park and <br />the 60% inside the Urban Service Area, thought if it had been done with Liberty Park <br />they would have had a poor design, and they would have had some of the higher density <br />8 <br />October 20, 2008 <br />Public Workshop <br />