Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chairman Neuberger inquired when the pictures were taken and Mr. MacNamee responded <br />“right after the two hurricanes.” <br /> <br />Mr. MacNamee <br />apprised the Board of State Law that dictates that there should be no <br />accumulation of water under mobile houses, and informed them that all he was asking for is relief. He <br />read parts of a letter from St. John Water Control District pointing out that the property owner is <br />responsible for the drainage of the entire project. He noted that operators have, in the past, put boots on <br />the end of downspouts to lead the water to drains. <br /> <br />th <br />Discussion ensued regarding control elevation and elevation of 12 Street. <br /> <br />Mr. MacNamee <br /> showed pictures of what happens to the water from a normal rain flow. <br /> <br />Mr. MacNamee <br />responding to the Chairman’s question as to what he wanted the Board to do, <br />said that Judge Hawley had said he wanted the Code Enforcement Board to take into consideration all the <br />things they have (photographs etc.) and he would designate what could be fixed, but Code had done <br />nothing. <br /> <br />County Attorney William Collins addressed the matter on behalf of the Code Board and updated <br />the Board on prior actions by the Code Board in handling this matter. The facts they have from Surveys <br />do not support any violations to bring to Code Enforcement, he said. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion ensued on what was deemed a code violation and where property owners would go <br />for relief. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger was not sure what the County was supposed to do since the Code Board <br />found no violations. Attorney Collins explained that it had not gone to Code Enforcement because staff <br />had no evidence that there were violations. <br />October 3, 2006 <br />58 <br /> <br />