My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/10/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
01/10/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2022 11:43:06 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/10/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3097
Book and Page
130, 047-070
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
281
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Bowden thought the 4,100 square foot house would be too large for <br />the small lots (10,000 square foot). <br />Vice Chairman Wheeler’s biggest concern was interconnectivity; he also was <br />opposed to gated communities because he wanted through traffic between neighborhoods open to <br />the general public. That would have to change before he could give his support to this project. <br />Chairman Neuberger recalled that residents get annoyed when motorists use side <br />streets as shortcuts through their neighborhood. He thought it would help relieve traffic by having <br />to some extent interconnectivity with adjacent neighborhoods. <br />Commissioner Lowther agreed with Chairman Neuberger’s position and had no <br />problem with the bonus room model’s height. <br />P & Z Chairman Donna Keys <br /> explained the P & Z’s position to regulate the height <br />and the mass of houses in this project. She explained the reasons behind the trade offs. She <br />explained the small lot sizes, large house sizes, and setback requests of the applicant. She saw the <br />mistake of limiting 2-story homes in developments; they should have been restricting the height of <br />homes as well because the developers are now designing taller homes and calling them 1-story. <br />She saw this proposal as getting around the P & Z’s objective in recommending restrictions on <br />2-story houses and predicted greater scrutiny of future projects. <br />Commissioner Lowther thought this could be an on-going battle with small lot <br />subdivisions but he had no problem with this “bonus room” model. <br /> <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. No one from the public wished to speak <br />and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to approve staff’s <br />recommendation including the “bonus room” model (The <br />Cypress) reference. <br /> <br />January 10, 2006 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.