My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/13/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
01/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:16:40 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/13/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2926
Book and Page
126, 388-420
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
406
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />with funding (to find statistics and demographics) and could pool the information and save money. <br /> A comprehensive plan would provide a clearer assessment of needs and overlapping services in the <br />community. Such a plan could be made available to a lot of organizations to provide information, <br />enable them to apply for grants, and take some of the tax burden off the County. They would like <br />to explore this idea to see if it will be acceptable. <br />Tom Brown <br />, CEO of Indian River County United Way, advised that the United <br />Way definitely supports the concept. It would be helpful to UW and the entire community by <br />pinpointing unmet needs so UW can channel its funds to provide more of an impact on the needs of <br />the citizens. UW is willing to financially support the study in an appropriate amount in proportion <br />to the other agencies involved. <br />Chairman Ginn asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak, there were none. <br />She then stated that it would be impossible for us to act under our ordinance and guidelines which <br />is defined to be services for children up to 18 years of age. <br />Ms. Maurer <br /> explained this would be a steering committee and would not take <br />anything away from the needs assessment committee. <br />Commissioner Macht suggested that our contribution could be specific to whatever <br />tenets we choose to put on it. This idea was discussed several years ago with the former director <br />of United Way and others in the community and they generally agreed it would be a more economic <br />and comprehensive way to do it. He believed we could structure the County’s participation in <br />whatever way our ordinance requires. <br />Commissioner Adams thought this would be beneficial. <br />Chairman Ginn disagreed because she viewed it as expanding the scope and we <br />already have an up-to-date needs assessment and we have not even begun to fulfill all the unmet <br />needs. She continued to cite additional reasons for her opposition. <br />Commissioner Macht understood Chairman Ginn’s objections but felt that an overall <br />study would be beneficial to the children and the community and this request is just to explore <br />January 13, 2004 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.