Laserfiche WebLink
Ruth Stanbridge said that the property owners on 66th Avenue had not received the <br />Resolution of Necessity. <br />Attorney Collins clarified that the Resolution of Necessity is not directed to the <br />property owner, but rather to the Court to show why it is imperative to acquire the property; and <br />the description of what the County is offering to buy is what the property owner receives. He said <br />that when staff receives the necessary documents to bring the Resolution of Necessity forward, <br />they will do so. He reemphasized the complexity of the process and stressed why the procedures <br />need to be followed as closely as possible, and not on a rigid time frame. <br />Attorney DeBraal informed the Board that the final draft of the Corridor Study had <br />been prepared and submitted for review; and that once the Scale Report is received and approved, <br />staff will receive the Resolution of Necessity. <br />There was a brief discussion regarding the rejection of offers, and going to Court. <br />In response to Chairman Davis's question, Attorney DeBraal reassured him that no <br />Resolution of Necessity had been issued without the completion of the Scale Reports. <br />Charlene Brown recapped the actions from the August 12, 2008 Board of County <br />Commission Meeting regarding the discussions between Commissioner O'Bryan and Director <br />Chris Mora relating to the status of the Scale Report. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Chris Mora detailed the current status for the three <br />pending segments and their Scale Reports. <br />17 <br />January 13, 2009 <br />