My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/13/2009 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
01/13/2009 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:26:08 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:22:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/13/2009
Meeting Body
Solid Waste Disposal Board
Archived Roll/Disk#
4024
Book and Page
136, 597-600
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7347
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chairman Flescher wanted to know if 30 additional days would be long enough to <br />complete their negotiations. <br />Tex Carter, President and Chief Operating Officer of New Planet Energy, did not feel <br />that 30 days would be sufficient time due to "legalisms" and/or other situations that might arise. <br />He indicated that the details of the Joint Venture Agreement are the reason why the negotiations <br />have taken so much time, and that his staff would continue to report any anticipated delays. He <br />said that he would relocate to Indian River County when the construction phase begins. <br />Vice Chairman Flescher believed this program to be of "tremendous value" and wanted <br />assurance from Mr. Carter that 60 days would be ample time to finalize the agreement with <br />INEOS in lieu of 30 days. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Flescher, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Solari, to approve sixty (60) <br />days additional time for New Planet Energy to finalize the <br />Joint Venture Agreement with INEOS Bio. <br />Michael McAllister, Attorney for Ameresco, provided a copy of the letter that was sent <br />to the Board on January 9, 2009 (copy on file). He emphasized that the deadline was established <br />for important reasons, and felt the result of a 60 -day delay would push the project back even <br />further, putting Ameresco in an awkward position as the number two bidder. He spoke about the <br />changing of the energy and financial markets, project financing, and the comparison of annual <br />revenue. He stressed Ameresco's financial and technical ability to start the job "now." <br />January 13, 2009 <br />S.W.D.D. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.