Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Administrator Baird commented on procedures usually followed by staff in <br />processing such applications. <br /> <br />(CLERK’S NOTE: THE CHAIRMAN CALLED A SHORT RECESS AT 10:28 A.M. <br />AND RECONVENED AT 10:39 A.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT.) <br /> <br />Discussion continued and County Traffic Engineer, Chris Mora, provided <br />comments on traffic studies. <br /> <br />Beth-Ann Krimskey, Esquire <br />, Ruden McCloskey et al, 145 NW Central Park <br />Place, Port St. Lucie, representing Shelby Homes. She stated that while she appreciated the <br />opportunity for herself and Mr. Shelley to address the Commission they were not waiving any <br />rights by doing so at this time. Also they did not believe there was a pending appeal in relation to <br />the concurrency determination that took place on December 12, 2005; there was no appropriate <br />action for the Board to take at that time and this was not a fact-based hearing. The key point is that <br />th <br />the determination was made; the final certificate was issued on December 12 ; and, as County <br />Attorney Collins pointed out to the Commission, there is a very specific procedure in the Code <br />(910.12) relating to concurrency determinations. Concluding, she again thanked the Commission <br />for the opportunity of having the public discussion and stated, for the record, that there was no <br />authority at that point to take any action on the appeal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lowther reiterated that this does bring forward the issue of how <br />th <br />important it is for the Board to possibly look at the “boulevard effect” for 27 Avenue; and, to <br />design something that the residents of Indian River County would be happy with. He agreed with <br />Commissioner Davis that the applications were in before the pending ordinance doctrine was set. <br />JANUARY 17, 2006 17 <br /> <br />