My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/17/2007 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
01/17/2007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 2:31:52 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:11:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop - Charter Government
Document Type
Implementation
Meeting Date
01/17/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3128
Book and Page
132, 065-077
Subject
Charter Government
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3060
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Under "Governmental Reform" she discussed the legislative and executive <br />branches' functions and options under a Charter government; constitutional officers, reserved <br />powers to the people, which means there is opportunity for greater citizen involvement in a Charter <br />form of government, and the opportunity to give yourself regional countywide powers. These <br />provisions need to be in the Charter, she advised. <br />On the topic of "Preempted Power" Ms. Delegal explained that in the area of <br />taxation, all taxes other than ad valorem property taxes are pre-empted to the State, and the <br />Legislature has the absolute power of pre-emption in the area of taxes. She also discussed other <br />Additional Revenue Sources for a Charter county, which are not many that a Charter county can <br />levy that a non- Charter cannot, but include Public Service Tax, and Communication Services Tax. <br />Under "Government Partner Views" Ms. Delegal pointed out that when a county <br />becomes a Charter its government partners look at them differently. She related that in the past <br />year, Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA) were good examples in terms of the <br />disproportionate negotiating power that a non -Charter county would have with a municipality that <br />might want to create a CRA versus a Charter county. With CRAs, if municipalities create a CRA <br />then all of the tax increments, the increase in property values from the investment that has been put <br />in that area, goes to the CRA. Until last year the negotiating power for a Charter county was <br />dramatically different. <br />In closing Ms. Delegal talked about "Regionalism and Reform". She advised that <br />the peoples of the counties of Florida can chose to have Charter governments and certain regional <br />powers and there was also the opportunity for governmental reform. She reminded that sometimes <br />change comes in increments, and they should try to take small steps in dealing with local issues. <br />5. BOARD DISCUSSION <br />Public Workshop 01/17/07 4 <br />Charter Government <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.