My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/24/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
01/24/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 4:34:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:58:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/2006
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3097
Book and Page
130, 117-153
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE 2006-003 — BRYONE <br />BEATTY'S REOUEST TO REZONE ±17.53 ACRES LOCATED <br />AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION <br />OF 16TH STREET AND 66TH AVENUE, FROM A-1 TO RM -6 <br />(BYRON BEATTY) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE <br />OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating, through a PowerPoint <br />presentation, showed the location of the property to be rezoned; reviewed the existing land uses, <br />the criteria analyzed, and concurrency. He pointed out the land use designation is M-1, and the <br />applicant is asking for less than the land use designation. He reviewed the environmental impacts, <br />and compatibility. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a 4-1 vote, recommended <br />that the Board approve the rezoning from A-1 to RM -6. <br />There were comments made by Commissioner Wheeler and Attorney Collins <br />regarding the rezoning. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br />Attorney Bruce Barkett, representing Byron Beatty, commented on the trips and <br />links showed in the traffic study completed by his client. <br />Peter Robinson, a resident west of the subject project, thought the Board should <br />look after the younger people in the community by rezoning this property to RM -8 instead of <br />RM -6. The Chairman replied that the applicant did not apply for RM -8. <br />There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />January 24, 2006 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.