My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/1/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
11/1/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:09 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:44:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/01/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />d ' <br />CHANGE IN THE PASTER PLAN. SHE ALSO NOTED THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE <br />INDICATED BY AN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY THAT THEY ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF A <br />CHANGE IN THIS AREA., COMMISSIONER Loy STATED, IN ADDITIO1, THAT THERE <br />HAVE BEEN NO MAJOR CHANGES IN THE AREAS OF SUPPLYING NEEDED SERVICE <br />4 <br />FOR UTILITIES, AND DID NOT FEEL WE HAVE RECEIVED VALID REASONS FOR <br />MAKING A CHANGE, AND SHE, THEREFORE, FELT THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE <br />COUNTY WOULD BE SERVED IF THE (ASTER PLAN WERE NOT CHANGED AT THIS <br />TIME. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON FELT THERE MUST BE A BALANCE BETWEEN <br />PUBLIC CONCERN AND PRIVATE INTEREST. HE ALSO FELT THERE IS A NEED <br />TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVES TO THE COSTLY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND <br />STATED HE COULD SUPPORT OTHER TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT IF LOW DENSITY WERE <br />MAINTAINED. HE DID NOT FEEL, HOWEVER, THAT HE HAD THAT ASSURANCE <br />SINCE THE PROPERTY COULD BE TRA!ISFERRED. COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED <br />THAT HE, THEREFORE, WOULD VOTE AGAINST ANY CHANGE TO THE (ASTER PLAN. <br />COMMISSIONER'SCHMUCKER STATED THAT BASICALLY HE BELIEVES <br />THAT A MIXTURE OF DEVELOPMENT IS PREFERABLE AND THAT MOTH MULTIFAMILY <br />AND SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IS NEEDED IN THE COMMUNITY. HE CONTINUED <br />THAT HE FELT THE HIGHER DENSITY SHOULD NAVE BEEN ALLOWED UP NEAR THE <br />CITY OF VERO BEACH LIMITS BECAUSE THERE IS ALREADY HIGH DENSITY THERE, <br />BUT THE PROBLEM HE HAS WITH THIS PROPOSAL IS THAT IT IS HOP -SKIPPING <br />PARTIALLY DOIIN THE ISLAND AND IS SERVING MAINLY ONE INDIVIDUAL. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE DOES FEEL THIS TYPE OF DEVELOP- <br />MENT SHOULD BE IN THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, BUT THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH <br />THIS REQUEST IS MADE MAKES HIM FEEL THAT THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR IT, <br />HE NOTED THAT HE HAS -ALWAYS CONSIDERED MASTER PLANS AS BLOBS,: AND HE <br />WOULD RATHER PUT ABOUT FIVE OR SIX LITTLE ROUND DOTS DOWN THE ISLAND <br />TO ALLOW A LITTLE BIT OF MULTIPLE IN SEVERAL AREAS, BUT OUR RULES <br />AND REGULATIONS DO NOT ALL01,11 THIS. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER CONTINUED <br />THAT WE HAVE A SEVERE PROBLEM WITH WATER AND SEWER IN THE SOUTH BEACH <br />AREA; IN ADDITION, MOST OF THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT THE PROPOSED CHANGES; <br />AND HE, THEREFORE, WOULD VOTE AGAINST IT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT IN THE FUTURE THERE IS GOING TO <br />BE A NEED FOR SOME CLUSTERING AND POSSIBLY SOME MULTIPLE FAMILY, AND <br />55 <br />NOV 1 197 7 <br />1, <br />r <br />.i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.