My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
11/21/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:09 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:46:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER TO STICK TO THE <br />LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE NOTICE, BUT IF THE BOARD WISHES TO ADDRESS IT <br />DIFFERENTLY, THAT CAN BE DONE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK IN <br />REGARD TO AREA 4, WHICH COMBINES NOS. 6 AND 7. <br />ROY COWLE SPOKE ON BEHALF OF ROLAND MILLER, WHO OWNS A PARCEL <br />CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 4 ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE <br />INTERSECTION OF 512 AND 510 THAT IS PRESENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL. HE NOTED <br />THERE IS A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR WHICH ALL APPROPRIATE SITE <br />PLAN APPROVALS, BUILDING PERMITS, ETC., WERE RECEIVED, AND IT IS <br />APPROXIMATELY 75-80% COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. IN RECOGNITION OF,THIS FACT, <br />MR. COWLE REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD LEAVE THE FOUR ACRE PARCEL -ZONED AS <br />IT IS PRESENTLY ZONED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT BASICALLY THE INTERSECTION SHOULD BE <br />COMMERCIAL AND POSSIBLY SOME OF THE AREA IN NOS. 10 AND 12 ON THE MAP <br />(ALSO CALLED AREA 6) SHOULD BE ELIMINATED. (THIS IS PROPERTY ON 510 <br />SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION.) HE CONTINUED THAT HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT <br />VOTING ON AREA 4 .(NOS. 6 AND 7 ON THE MAP) AND WHAT WILL OCCUR IN AREA 6. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO CONTINUE <br />THE HEARING ON AREA 5 AND THEN COME BACK AND VOTE ON 4, 5 AND 6. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK EXPLAINED THAT AREA 5 IS BASICALLY <br />THE NORTH SIDE OF 512 BEGINNING AT THE NORTH SIDE OF 510 AND GOING UP TO <br />THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF 512 BEGINNING AT A POINT <br />1320' EAST OF 510 AND GOING UP TO THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. THE SAME RE- <br />ZONING'IS PROPOSED IN TERMS OF NEED FOR COMMERCIAL AREA IN THE TOTAL <br />COUNTY AND IN THIS AREA IN PARTICULAR. <br />MR. REDICK CONTINUED THAT AREA 6 IS nos. 10, 11 AND 12 AS <br />SHOWN ON THE MAP. N0.•10 IS 1320' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 510 AND <br />512 AND RANGES 2640' SOUTH FROM 512. THAT AREA IS TO BE CHANGED FROM <br />C-1 AND R-1 TO B-1. NO 12, WHICH IS THE AREA DIRECTLY EAST OF N0. .10 AND <br />EAST OF S.R. 510, IS TO BE CHANGED FROM C-1 AND A TO -B-1. NO. 11, WHICH <br />IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF NOS. 10 AND 12 ON BOTH SIDES OF 510 IS TO BE CHANGED <br />FROM R-1 TO R-3 ON THE WEST AND FROM A TO R-3 ON THE EAST.. THE BASIC <br />REASONING WAS THAT THERE WAS ROOM AND NEED FOR SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT <br />gfl <br />aca 37 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.