Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />vt <br />L� <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG STATED THAT HE BELIEVED THERE WAS SORT <br />OF A TRADE-OFF. THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH INCLUDES THE CEMETERY AND THE <br />SCHOOL PROPERTY, AND IT WAS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD AT <br />THAT TIME DID NOT WANT ANY COMMERCIAL. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF MR. ANSIN WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF MOVING <br />THE COMMERCIAL FORWARD ACROSS THE INTERSECTION. HE FELT THAT 660' ON <br />BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD IS ADEQUATE, AND COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT <br />ONE OF THE BOARD'S CONCERN WAS THE SCHOOL CHILDREN HAVING TO CROSS THE <br />ROAD WITH NO COMMERCIAL ON THE NORTH SIDE. <br />MR. ANSIN STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO COMMERCIAL <br />ON THE NORTH SIDE, BUT HE WAS NOT CERTAIN HOW MANY ACRES THEY WERE TALKING <br />ABOUT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED MOVING THE COMMERCIAL MORE TO THE <br />NORTH AND REDUCING IT TO THE SOUTH, AND MR. ANSIN ASKED DID HE MEAN TO <br />TAKE THE 80 ACRE BLOCK AND SHIFT IT NORTH? <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED IF WE LEFT THE B -I LINE WHERE IT WAS AND <br />WENT NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION, WE WOULD END UP WITH ABOUT 180-200 ACRES <br />COMMERCIAL AND HE FELT THAT WOULD BE TOO MUCH FOR FUTURE NEEDS. <br />MR..ANSIN STATED THAT THEY HOPED TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP A <br />LARGER INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL AREA IN -THE FUTURE. IF THE 80 ACRES WERE <br />REDUCED TO 60 ACRES, HE FELT IT WOULD CAUSE THEM NO PROBLEMS, BUT THEY <br />WOULD REQUEST THAT THE R-3 BE EXTENDED TO ABUT IT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT WAS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE R-3, <br />MR. ANSIN STATED THAT THEY WOULD JUSTIFY THE R-3 IN TERMS OF <br />BEING SUPPORTIVE OF THE COMMERCIAL AND THE OTHER SERVICES THAT WOULD <br />BE DEVELOPED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT THE R-3 AT THIS POINT IS PERHAPS <br />A LITTLE PREMATURE. IT IS THE HIGHEST DENSITY WE HAVE, <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED HOW MR. ANSIN WILL SEWER IT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT IS THE PROBLEM. HE NOTED THAT <br />THE MASTER PLAN CAN BE USED AS A TOOL, AND THE R-3 ABUTTING R-1 WOULD BE <br />APPROPRIATE AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE, BUT IN REGARD TO REZONING AT <br />THE PRESENT MOMENT, IT IS PREMATURE. THERE IS ALSO THE QUESTION OF <br />WHETHER OR NOT SHOWING IT ON THE MASTER PLAN AUTOMATICALLY ENTITLES YOU <br />TO A REZONING. <br />31 <br />eua 37 <br />jjo <br />�'`� <br />