11/21/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s MRS. MCCAIN STATED THAT SHE NOW REALIZES THAT HER PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THIS AREA ON THE WEST SIDE JUST BELOW THE DIVIDING LINE IN VERO LAKE ESTATES. SHE STATED THAT IF HER PROPERTY SHOULD BECOME AGRICULTURAL, SHE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT SHE COULD DO WITH IT, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THERE WAS A DISCREPANCY IN THE PARCEL. THE -INDIVIDUAL NOTICE TO THE LAND OWNER INDICATED R-1 AND THE NOTICE IN THE PAPER INDICATED AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING. HE FELT THE COMMISSIONERS MIGHT WANT TO HOLD OFF ON THIS LITTLE PARCEL AND RECONSIDER IT AT THE SAME TIME WITH THE OTHER. HE FELT THAT THE INDIVIDUAL NOTICES THAT WERE MAILED OUT WOULD CONTROL, AND IT.WAS THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARDS INTENT TO REZONE TO R-1 ON THE WEST SIDE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO HOLD OFF, IF THE ATTORNEY WILL EXPLAIN HOW THIS CAN BE DONE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT VERO LAKES ESTATES COULD JUST BE DELETED FROM THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS - SIONER LYONS, THAT: THE SOUTH 660' OF SECTION 30, TWP. 31S, RANGE 39E, LESS THE EAST 1320'; THE I4ORTH 660' OF SECTION 31, TWP. 31S, RANGE 39E, LESS THE EAST 855' THEREOF; THE SOUTH 660' OF SECTION 25, TWP. 31S, RANGE 38E; THE NORTH 660' OF SECTION 36, TWP. 31S,.RANGE 38E, LESS THE NORTH 660' OF THE W 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4; THE SOUTH 660' OF SECTION 26, TWP. 31S, RANGE 38E, LESS THE WEST 660'; THE WEST 660' OF THE SLI 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, Twp. 31S, RANGE 38E; AND THE NORTH 660' OF SECTION 35, TWP. 31S, RANGE 38E, BE REZONED FROM C-1 COMMERCIAL TO A -AGRICULTURAL, FOR THE REASONS OF REDUCING THE TOTAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DETERMINED TO BE TOO LARGE TO UTILIZE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE, AND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MASTER PLAN. NOV 2 11978 44 pl�E I