My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/14/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
11/14/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2018 2:16:44 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Jt. Mtg. with City of Vero Beach
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/14/2005
Meeting Body
City of Vero Beach
Archived Roll/Disk#
3096
Book and Page
129, 840-858
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
278
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CVB <br />ITY OF ERO EACH <br />thrdth <br />Council Member Solari favored widening 26 Street from 43 to 66 Avenue with a <br />lot of landscaping. Building a community road rather than just putting down asphalt would create <br />a positive community asset. <br />Engineering Director Monte Falls advised that a selection committee has been set to <br />review the design consultants’ proposals this week after the schedule was interrupted by Hurricane <br />Wilma. After hearing the proposals, the committee will short-list the bidders. <br />th <br />Chairman Lowther suggested moving the 26 Street intersection at the railroad <br />th <br />tracks one block north to 27 Street where the Administration Building is being built. This would <br />lessen traffic through McAnsh Park. He wanted to know the feasibility of moving that railroad <br />crossing and what the City thought about the idea. <br />Mr. Falls and County staff will research that suggestion. <br /> <br />8. VISIONING <br /> <br />IRC <br />NDIAN IVER OUNTY <br />Director Keating presented a PowerPoint outline (copy on file with the backup in the <br />Office of the Clerk to the Board) and advised that the basic concepts of the visioning plan were: <br />how do we want to see the County grow and does the Comprehensive Plan need to be changed to <br />achieve it. He advised of the workshops, charettes, interruptions/delays due to Hurricanes Frances <br />and Jeanne, and the oversight committee meetings. The MPO process differed from the City’s <br />visioning process because the oversight committee consisted of all the elected officials of the <br />Board of County Commissioners, School Board and all five municipalities. Alternatives were <br />developed: 1) continue the existing trends, 2) reduce development by lowering densities <br />throughout the county, and 3) villages inside and outside the urban service area. There were a lot <br />of diverse opinions particularly for Gifford and Fellsmere. He thought a general liking of the <br />November 14, 2005 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.