Laserfiche WebLink
7. <br />CONSENT AGENDA (CONTINUED.) PAGES <br />C. Dori Slosberg Driver Education Safety Act Indian River County Traffic <br /> <br />Education Program Trust Fund <br />(memorandum dated November 8, 2005) 27-28 <br /> Accepted the report from the inception of the $3 fee, October 1, 2002 <br />through September 30, 2005. Total amount received thru September 30, <br />2005 is $129,620.00. <br /> <br /> <br />D. Request for Authorization for Staff to Call Letter of Credit, Subdivision: <br /> <br />Amelia Plantation, Developer: Amelia Plantation Group, L.L.C. (Mark A. <br />Brackett, Manager) <br />(memorandum dated November 8, 2005) 29-48 <br /> Approved and adopted Resolution # 2005-188 authorizing staff to call the <br />existing Harbor Federal Savings Bank Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 390, <br />as amended, in favor of Indian River County in the amount of remaining <br />amount of $227,217.63 on or before December 1, 2005. <br /> <br />E. Addendum No. 2 to “Agreement for Services” between Nick Miller, Inc. and <br /> <br />Indian River County – Murphy Act Reservation and Release Mapping Project <br />– Original IRC Project No. 0360 <br />(memorandum dated November 8, 2005) 49-53 <br /> Approved Addendum No. 2 to the addendum/agreement and scope of <br />services for a lump sum of $5,600 and subsequent hourly fees for additional <br />additions as needed. <br /> <br />F. Oslo Road Bridge Replacement and Roadway Widening Engineering <br /> <br />Services Amendment No. 6 – 20” Water Main Utility Design Services Oslo <br />Road (CR606)/Lateral “J” Canal Bridge Replacement <br />(memorandum dated November 7, 2005) 54-56 <br /> Approved Amendment No. 6 to the Oslo Road Bridge Replacement and <br />Road Widening Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn for the <br />hourly rate component of $8,100. <br /> <br />G. Bid Rejection for IRC Bid No. 2006024 Project No. 9705B Oslo Road <br /> <br />(CR606)/Lateral “J” Canal Bridge Replacement <br />(memorandum dated November 8, 2005) 57-60 <br /> Approved to reject bid and the project be re-advertised because of the <br />extreme difference between the bid and the engineer’s estimate. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 12 <br />November 15, 2005 <br /> <br />