My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/16/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 12:24:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 896-940
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
447
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />attention to the recommendations suggested by the Task <br />Force; that no applications for new or residential <br />preliminary plats or site plans that have not already <br />received the PD status will be accepted. <br /> <br /> County Attorney Collins noted that the motion will not be self-executing but <br />must be adopted through an ordinance after advertisement and public hearings are held. He <br />understood that he was to accept that motion as a direction to prepare such an ordinance. <br /> <br /> The Chairman opened the floor for public discussion even though it was not an <br />advertised public hearing. <br /> <br /> Peter Robinson, <br /> 315 Greytwig Road, spoke in opposition to a moratorium <br />and questioned what projects this motion would affect. A three-month moratorium means a lot of <br />money if you are a developer carrying a loan and the money is coming out of your pocket. <br /> County Attorney Collins explained that an Ordinance would have to be <br />drafted; a public hearing would be held; and then be filed with the State before a moratorium <br />would become effective. Any project not heard by the time of the hearing would be subject to this <br />moratorium. <br /> Discussion continued whereby the question of how projects coming before the <br />Board would be affected and Director Keating explained that the only type of project that would <br />not be affected would be any that already had the conceptual PD plan approved by the Board. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION but the <br />Commissioners were not ready to vote. <br /> <br /> Discussion continued. <br />NOVEMBER 16, 2004 31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.