My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/16/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 12:24:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 896-940
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
447
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7. LDRP80’BH <br /> ERTAINING TO UILDING EIGHT <br /> Commissioner Wheeler wanted to direct staff to change the LDR height <br />limitation back to 35 feet, plus 15 feet for the roof, and grandfather the CVS facility west of I-95. <br />(Recently amended special height allowance of 80 feet). Because the character of the County is <br />predicated on density and the tight restrictions on building heights, he felt it is important to <br />maintain the 35’ height limitation. He wants the Board to have public hearings and start from <br />ground zero if there are other requests. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Davis was concerned about the grandfather clause. If there <br />were to be a natural disaster they could rebuild to 80’, but if they have a fire they could not. He <br />thought the best way to address this is to make the LDRS site specific. <br /> Chairman Neuberger responded that it is very specific and felt that the LDRS <br />do not need to be amended. He added that CVS is building less than what is allowed. <br /> Commissioner Wheeler inquired if there is a way to leave an LDR in place that <br />would specifically cover only that site. <br /> County Attorney Collins responded that normally ordinances do apply <br />uniformly throughout the jurisdiction. What was suggested may be possible, but they must avoid <br />being arbitrary. The attempt in the original drafting of the ordinance was to have size requirements <br />and setbacks to preclude this from happening again. <br /> <br />14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT - NONE <br /> <br />14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT - NONE <br /> <br />14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD - NONE <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 16, 2004 36 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.