My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 3:32:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC / ECB / SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 788-851
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
445
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Lowther, Community Development Director Bob <br />Keating advised that the developer was fined $7,394.00 (50 cents/square foot) for illegal removal <br />of vegetation from a 20’ wide native upland conservation easement along the eastern boundary of <br />Phase II-D (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block A). The applicant also had to pay a fee in lieu of <br />setting aside the land for conservation and that came to $31,898. The total amount for clearing that <br />area illegally was $39,292. <br />Then Director Keating responded to another question as to whether or not the <br />County could have required the applicant to replant the vegetation plus the fine. He stated that the <br />County could have, but staff determined that it was not high quality vegetation and we have been <br />moving further away from having conservation on individual lots to conservation on separate <br />tracts. <br />County Attorney Collins explained that Lindsey Lanes was the first subdivision to <br />have a conservation easement for native uplands after the Comp Plan was adopted in 1990 <br />establishing a policy of preserving them. The conservation easements were imposed and it was <br />subsequently found there was a lot of difficulty in placing pools and patios because of the <br />th <br />easements. The original developer came and set aside about 3-5 acres off 13 Street SW where <br />they could substitute an easement in an intact area and get releases from some of the single family <br />lots. That was not the case here, this was accidental clearing apparently but they did pay the fine <br />rather than substitute other properties. <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously <br />approved the proposed Partial Release of Conservation <br />Easement and authorized the Chairman of the Board to <br />execute same, as recommended in the memorandum of <br />August 25, 2004. <br />COPY OF PARTIAL RELEASE IS ON FILE <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />November 2, 2004 <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.