Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />approval from the master property owners association for <br />the gates; and 2) document that the master property owners <br />association limits use of gates as reflected in condition 2A <br />above, as recommended in the memorandum of October 27, <br />2004. <br /> <br />9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM <br />ROBERT M. NICHOLAS, DMD REGARDING OAK CHASE <br />UPDATE <br /> <br />th <br />Dr. Robert Nicholas <br />, 6560 35 Lane, Oak Chase, referred to various letters he <br />called exhibits having to do with work not completed by the developer of Oak Chase. (Copies of <br />the exhibits he reviewed have been filed with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) <br />He had previously appeared before the Board and thanked Commissioner Macht for trying to assist <br />but the uncompleted work list remains the same. He inquired if there is some mechanism by which <br />the County could require the developer to complete these items and asked how long they must be <br />patient for they have been subject to David Chase’s rhetoric and delay tactics for four years. He <br />stated he had put the ball in the Board’s court because the homeowners need their “clout” <br />particularly because the same developer continues to develop property in Indian River County. <br />Commissioner Lowther suggested the homeowners contact an attorney. The Board <br />could provide the clout in Mr. Chase’s future developments but that will not help the people in Oak <br />Chase. <br />Commissioner Macht indicated his frustration and remarked that The Meadows is <br />having the same problem. The man appears to be one of no integrity. He wondered if the Board <br />could be allowed to turn down his future projects. <br />November 2, 2004 <br />18 <br /> <br />