My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 3:32:09 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC / ECB / SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 788-851
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
445
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />see how it flushes out. He also believed the pipeline is misinterpreted because developers will not <br />build until the buyers are there. <br />Joseph Paladin <br />, a developer, discussed the advantages (control) of PDs (planned <br />developments) and recounted that he had warned of a negative of not using PDs, that is people <br />would used the small lot subdivision. He felt that small lot subdivisions have a place for affordable <br />housing but was concerned that it might be used to circumvent the PD process. He has been <br />outspoken against moratoriums but in retrospect he thought he was not as right as he thought he <br />was back then nor did he think Mrs. Ginn was as wrong as he thought she was back then. He <br />cautioned the Commissioners to be really careful about moratoriums or slow downs so as not to <br />bring about a rush on rezonings by out-of-town investors wanting to maximize their property <br />investments. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Neuberger, <br />SECONDED by Chairman Ginn, to direct staff move <br />forward the interim control measures. <br /> <br />County Attorney Collins advised this would have to come back in the form of an <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioners Macht and Commissioner Lowther reiterated their opposition to the <br />motion so the three new Commissioners will have their own input and be the ones to construct this. <br />Discussion ensued. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />failed 2-2 (Commissioners Macht and Lowther opposed, <br />and Commissioner Adams absent.) <br /> <br />November 2, 2004 <br />40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.