Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPORTED THAT MR. NELSON HAD THE EVALUA- <br />T'ION SHEETS BACK ON THE CONSOLE ENGINE ANALYZER, AND MR. NELSON RECOM- <br />MENDED THAT PATS AUTO PARTS BE SELECTED. <br />ON.MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, <br />THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF PAT'S' AUTO PARTS FOR A CONSOLE <br />ENGINE ANALYZER, KAL EQUIPMENT #4098, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST <br />BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS,IN THE AMOUNT OF $999.00. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED ON THE FUEL BIDS AND <br />STATED THAT CHEVRON WAS THE OVERALL LOW BIDDER. HE NOTED THAT MACMILLAN <br />OIL CAN GIVE US A GUARANTEE THAT THERE WILL BE NO PRICE CHANGE WITHIN <br />30 DAYS, AND CHEVRON CANNOT BECAUSE THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY A FIRM IN <br />CALIFORNIA. HE PERSONALLY FELT, HOWEVER, WE WOULD GET A MORE STABILIZED <br />PRICE FROM CHEVRON THAN WITH THE LOCAL FIRM. <br />ON MtlTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF CHEVRON FOR NO LEAD <br />GASOLINE, RESEARCH OCTANE 92, IN THE AMOUNT OF $.4750 PER GALLON, AND <br />FOR DIESEL FUEL IN THE AMOUNT OF $.4600 PER GALLON, AS BEING THE LOWEST <br />AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED THE SQUARING -OFF AGREEMENT <br />FOR WATER SERVICE, WHICH THEY ARE TRYING TO HANDLE UNDER THE TRI -PARTITE <br />AGREEMENT. HE STATED HIS GREATEST CONCERN IS THE METHOD OF PURCHASE <br />BY THE COUNTY AT THE TIME THEY DECIDE TO SERVE THESE AREAS BECAUSE HE <br />HAS PROBLEMS WITH THE FORMULA SET OUT WHICH STATES "THE PRICE SHALL BE <br />NEGOTIATED, BUT THE CAPITAL COST SHALL NOT EXCEED THE THEN REPLACEMENT <br />COST OF THE FACILITIES PURCHASED." HE POINTED OUT THAT THIS COULD <br />RESULT IN THE COUNTY PAYING AN INFLATED REPLACEMENT COST, WHICH WELL <br />COULD BE 1.00% MORE THAN WHEN THE INSTALLATIONS WERE MADE ORIGINALLY. <br />THE ATTORNEY FURTHER NOTED THAT THESE INSTALLATIONS ARE PAID FOR BY <br />DEVELOPERS AND THEN GIVEN TO THE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY WHO IS GOING TO <br />'ti 4 <br />PROVIDE THE SERVICE, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY SHOULD HAVE TO <br />PURCHASE FACILITIES FOR WHICH THE CITY, IN EFFECT, HAS MADE NO PAYMENT, <br />HE PROPOSED THAT THE PURCHASE PRICE BE TIED IN SOME WAY TO THE ACTUAL <br />EXPENDITURE. <br />67 <br />JAN 101979 <br />{38 PAGE <br />